Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=24 Randomized Single-blind Basic Science

RxConnect User Testing Study

Behavior

Enrolled (actual)
24
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Prescribing Errors by Study Arm — 8; 34; 8; 31 Medication orders

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
RxConnect (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Primary completion
Mar 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Prescribing Errors by Study Arm
8; 34; 8; 31; 3; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Medication Orders With a Large Magnitude Error (Greater Than 25% of the Recommended Dosing Range)
6; 22
SECONDARY
Time Taken to Prescribe Each Medication
179.7; 224.8
SECONDARY
Measurement of the Prescribers Perceived Mental Load Per Prescribing Scenario
41.45; 57.21

Summary

Background Medication errors are the leading cause of preventable harm in healthcare settings worldwide. An estimated 237 million medication errors occur in England alone every year, with 66 million considered clinically significant. There is an estimated cost to the NHS from definitely avoidable adverse drug reactions as a result of these errors of £98.5 million per year, consuming 181,626 bed-days and causing to 712 deaths. Medication related clinical decision support systems, often integrated with electronic prescribing systems, are rapidly increasing in number over the last few decades, ranging from drug-drug interaction alerts to allergy checks and formulary support. A recent systematic review summarised that these systems are still relatively immature, with limited use of patient-specific input or human factors research used to develop them. There is an opportunity to improve these systems significantly for the benefit of the user and for patient safety. The World Health Organization propose that interventions to reduce medication error should include the development of technologies that are well understood and designed for the systems and practice they are applied to. Human factors and usability engineering is an integral part of developing medical devices, such as clinical decision support (CDS) systems, to ensure that such devices are easy to use and can be used safely as intended. User testing / usability testing, which may incorporate several methods, should be conductive throughout the development process (at formative, summative assessment, and during post-market surveillance). These methods are now becoming more common place in healthcare technology research and should continue to support the development of new technologies. RxConnect RxConnect, a newly registered UKCA marked medical device, is an on-demand clinical decision support tool that receives medication and patient inputs and uses them to filter an underlying formulary, such as the BNF, and perform dosing calculations, as needed, to return patient-specific dosing recommendations. RxConnect does not have a user interface and relies on an integration with third-party systems, such as electronic prescribing systems, to deliver CDS services to clinical end users. For this study a prototype user interface for RxConnect that emulates a typical electronic prescribing system will be used. The study team hypothesise that use of RxConnect as a digital prescribing aid is quicker, easier, and as safe to use as currently available prescribing aids. This study aims to utilise user testing to prove or disprove the above hypothesis and to generate quantitative and qualitative outputs to support the continued development of RxConnect prior to clinical deployment.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Willingness to consent and participate
  • Medical doctor - Foundation year 1 and above OR registered non-medical prescriber (e.g. nurses or pharmacists)
  • Regular (at least weekly) experience in prescribing medications as part of working role

Exclusion Criteria

  • Infrequent prescribing practice (less than once a week)
  • Not willing to participate
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05493072). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search