N/A N=35 Randomized Prevention

PE Audit and Feedback Pilot Study

Physical Inactivity · Cardiovascular Diseases

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05509803 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Mar 2026

Primary outcome: Primary: Scheduled Minutes of Physical Education/Week — -4.0; 2.3 scheduled minutes of PE per week

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: PE Audit and Feedback Tool (Behavioral)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: University of California, Berkeley
Primary completion: Jun 2024

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Scheduled Minutes of Physical Education/Week	-4.0; 2.3	—
PRIMARY Estimated Minutes of Physical Education/Week	-1.3; -8.0	—
PRIMARY % of PE Lesson Time in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity	9.8; 8.5	—

Summary

School physical education (PE) is one of the most valuable tools for increasing physical activity and fitness among youth of all backgrounds; however, compliance with existing PE laws is low (and differential by school race/ethnic and family-income composition, contributing to health disparities), and best practices for increasing compliance remain unknown. This study proposes to examine a novel approach for increasing PE law compliance by testing a PE audit and feedback tool (adapted from a tool used by the New York City Department of Education) in Oakland, California schools to determine the effectiveness, adaptability, and scalability of this potential cost-effective approach for increasing PE law compliance and student physical activity.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Elementary school in the Oakland Unified School District
>50% of students in the school qualify for free or reduced-price meals
>80% of students non-white

Exclusion Criteria

Having a PE program known by the PE Director to be well-established and/or meet/exceed district expectations for PE

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05509803). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.