Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=26 Diagnostic

The Effectiveness of a Novel Software Program to Help in ROTEM Interpretation

Coagulation Disorder, Blood
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05591014 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
26
Serious AEs
Results posted
Apr 2026
Primary outcomePrimary: Overall Proportion of Correct Clinician Responses Pre- and Post-application — 0.36; 0.84 Proportion of true positives — p=<0.001

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess a novel rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) interpretation software to determine whether its use improves the accuracy of clinician interpretation.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Overall Proportion of Correct Clinician Responses Pre- and Post-application
0.36; 0.84 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Overall Proportion of True Negative Clinician Responses Pre- and Post-application
0.88; 0.98
SECONDARY
Proportion of Correct Clinician Responses by Question Type Pre and Post Application
0.11; 0.75; 0.25; 0.82; 0.18; 0.69 <0.001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Current residents and attending physicians in the University of Utah Department of Anesthesiology who have a range of experience and exposure to thromboelastography

Exclusion Criteria

  • Refusal to consent or no longer an active member of the University of Utah Department of Anesthesiology
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05591014). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search