Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=96

Compensatory Kinematic Movements in Various Directions After Stroke

Cerebral Stroke · Hemiplegia, Spastic
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05683158 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
96
Serious AEs
Results posted
Feb 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Differences in Spatial Measurements of Trunk Dislocation Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients — 272.44; 221.24; 288.14; 253.50 millimeter — p=<.001

Summary

This is cross-sectional study. By comparing kinematic analysis between stroke and healthy subjects in various directions, this investigation analyzes the compensatory kinematic movement for reaching task in stroke survivors

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Differences in Spatial Measurements of Trunk Dislocation Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
272.44; 221.24; 288.14; 253.50; 274.83; 230.76 <.001 sig
PRIMARY
Differences in Spatial Measurements of Elbow and Shoulder Angle Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
132.27; 131.97; 133.70; 135.20; 127.04; 127.46
PRIMARY
Differences in Temporal Measurements of Movement Unit Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
4.47; 3.18; 5.02; 2.63; 4.11; 2.66
PRIMARY
Differences in Temporal Measurements of Hand Movement Time Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
3.42; 2.09; 3.49; 2.07; 3.26; 1.98
PRIMARY
Differences in Temporal Measurements of Hand Velocity Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
45.66; 75.40; 44.04; 76.47; 53.74; 79.15
PRIMARY
Differences in Temporal Measurements of Elbow Extension Acceleration Components During 3-directional Bell-reaching Task Between Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
344.75; 628.85; 321.28; 542.96; 396.78; 722.87
PRIMARY
Difference of the Components Temporal Measurements Between Healthy and Stroke
944.52; 805.28; 1003.22; 822.19; 1015.06; 1188.89
SECONDARY
Comparison of Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scores Between Chronic Stroke Patients and Healthy
51; 66

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria used in the randomized controlled trials were as follows:

Stroke

  • Subject consisted of the physician's confirmation of chronic hemiplegia
  • onset ≥ 6 months
  • Mini-mental state examination≥25
  • Biceps ≤2, Triceps≤2
  • Ability to Sit on a chair alone
  • FMA upper extremity score ≥ 21 points, FMA upper extremity ≤ 66 points

Healthy

  • Age of matching the stroke group
  • Absence of neurological disease and orthopedic disease

Exclusion Criteria

Stroke

  • Biceps>2, Triceps>2
  • Flaccid
  • Neglect syndrome
  • Have neurological disease and orthopedic disease
  • Lack of coordination
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05683158). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search