N/A
Completed N=33
Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance of Crystal Peel in the Treatment of Adults Presenting Facial Mild Acne
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05821296 ↗Enrolled (actual)
33
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Comparison of the Change From Baseline of Count Lesions on Each Visit to Evaluate the Efficacy and Clinical Performance of Crystal Peel for the Treatment of Acne. — 943; 647; 457; 407 Lesions count at each protocol visit — p=<0.0001
Summary
The goal of this interventional, confirmatory and post market study is to evaluate the efficacy and clinical performance of Crystal Peel in adults suffering mild facial acne vulgaris. The principal and secondary aims are:
* Principal aim: to evaluate the efficacy and clinical performance of Crystal Peel, a salicylic-based peel, for the treatment of acne by lesions counting (front, 2 cheeks, the chin above the jaw line (excluding the nose)) using both visual observation and palpation.
* Secondary aims: pores and texture analysis, visual effect (Standardized anonymized photographs, investigator global assessment, patient global assessment, local and overall tolerance of the Crystal Peel, subject's self-evaluation and potential adverse events collection.
The primary endpoint of the study will be an objective counting of the acne lesions performed on every visit.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Comparison of the Change From Baseline of Count Lesions on Each Visit to Evaluate the Efficacy and Clinical Performance of Crystal Peel for the Treatment of Acne. |
943; 647; 457; 407; 463 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Acne Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score |
1.85 | — |
| SECONDARY Acne Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scale |
1.82 | — |
| SECONDARY Local and Overall Tolerance of the Crystal Peel. |
10; 21; 1; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject's Satisfaction Questionnaire |
26; 31; 29; 31; 28; 30 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Adverse Events |
92; 22; 0; 103; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Number of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
355.03; 307.79; 324.18; 309.34; 321.91 | < 0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Area of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
19088.48; 16256.09; 17333.61; 16109.97; 17130.97 | < 0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Relative Area (Density) of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
7.88; 6.69; 7.21; 6.82; 7.23 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Depth of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
7.12; 6.73; 6.98; 6.85; 7.01 | 0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Average Area of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
51.39; 49.70; 50.76; 49.75; 50.44 | 0.011 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Volume of Detected Pores on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Pores Assessed by Colorface Device. |
143085.53; 116589.71; 128638.51; 116400.38; 128428.39 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Area of Line Marks on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Line Marks Assessed by Colorface Device. |
44845.94; 37327.69; 37615.13; 34126.74; 43277.71 | 0.003 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Depth of Line Marks on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Line Marks Assessed by Colorface Device. |
7.57; 7.21; 7.26; 7.19; 7.57 | 0.005 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Length of Line Marks on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Line Marks Assessed by Colorface Device. |
14139.88; 11890.16; 11824.88; 10849.32; 13980.52 | 0.011 sig |
| SECONDARY Comparison of Change From Baseline of Conspicuous Volume of Line Marks on Each Visit to Evaluate the Improvement of Line Marks Assessed by Colorface Device. |
359983.52; 284182.77; 286465.65; 254170.91; 345909.82 | 0.003 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Healthy subjects
- Gender: female and/or male.
- Age: 18 - 45
- Phototype I to IV according Fitzpatrick scale.
- Healthy subject with normal physical examination results and a medical history compatible with the requirements of the study.
- A healthy male or female subject with a medical diagnosis of mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris defined by at least 6 (six) inflammatory lesions, 12 (twelve) non-inflammatory lesions and no more than 2 (two) nodules (the nose is excluded for lesion count purposes).
- Subject declares to avoid exposure to UV radiation (tanning booths, phototherapy and sun) on the face for at least three months prior to the selection visit and agrees to avoid it throughout the study.
- Subject agrees not to apply any cosmetic, medical or aesthetic treatments outside the study protocol on the face for the duration of the study.
- For female subjects:
Female subject not in childbearing status (tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy), or Female subjects of childbearing potential who, in the opinion of the investigator, are using a reliable method of contraception (pill or contraceptive patch, IUD, implant or vaginal ring,condoms) for at least one month prior to the screening visit. Subject willing to continue using contraception during the study and one month after the end of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship.
- Subject in a social or sanitary establishment.
- Subject participating to another clinical research or being in an exclusion period for a previous study.
- Intensive exposure to sunlight or UV-rays within the previous 3 months and foreseen during the study.
- Subject with any skin or systemic disease (acute and/or chronic), in the previous year, likely to interfere with the measured parameters or to put the subject to an undue risk.
- Subject having history of allergy or hypersensitivity to one of the components of the tested device.
- Subject receiving any treatment that, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, may interfere with test results or put the subject to undue risk.
- Subjects on topical or oral treatments (such as Benzoyl Peroxide, Retinoic Acid, isotretinoin) that did not stop the treatment 30 days before their first peel (risk of over-peeling).
- Subjects with known salicylism or related medical indications.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05821296). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.