Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=124 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Cool vs Room-temperature Artificial Tears

Diabetic Retinopathy With Macular Edema of Both Eyes (Diagnosis) · Central Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema · Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Unspecified Eye · Cystoid Macular Edema · Ocular Surface Disease

Enrolled (actual)
124
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey. — 2.21; 1.95 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Iowa
Primary completion
Jul 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.
2.21; 1.95

Summary

Background and Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cooled versus room temperature artificial tears in reducing post intravitreal injection (IVI) ocular discomfort. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving IVI were randomized to either cooled or room temperature tears intervention groups. Both groups rated their ocular discomfort following IVI before intervention and again after administration of cooled or room temperature tears.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients were eligible if they were receiving standard intravitreal injections for their exudative age-related macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, or retinal neovascularization.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability or lack of willingness to participate in the study
  • Active ocular infection including infectious uveitis
  • First time receiving intravitreal injection
  • Those who reported never having ocular discomfort following intravitreal injections on the pre-injection questionnaire
  • Less than 18 years of age
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05832996). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search