Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=59 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Male External Catheters' Comparison of Comfort and Efficacy

Non-invasive Urine Output Management

Enrolled (actual)
59
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Performance of the PureWick MEC Against an Established Comparator — 97.8; 90.7; 91.1; 85.2 Percentage of urine captured — p=0.04

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
PureWick Male External Catheter (Device); Sage PrimoFit (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
C. R. Bard
Primary completion
Jun 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Performance of the PureWick MEC Against an Established Comparator
97.8; 90.7; 91.1; 85.2 0.04 sig
SECONDARY
Performance of the PureWick MEC in Morbidly Obese Subpopulation
99.7; 83.5; 80.8; 79.3
SECONDARY
Participant Comfort
3.85; 3.69; 3.71; 3.41; 3.57; 3.62
SECONDARY
Participant Comfort Scale Survey
4.29; 3.92; 4.0; 3.58; 3.84; 3.92
SECONDARY
Ease of Use by Health Care Professional (HCP)
4.59; 4.58; 4.71; 4.81

Summary

A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Single-blind, Single Center Healthy Volunteer Study conducted over 1 day, with 2 voids using the PureWick (PW) Male external catheter (MEC) vs. comparator Sage PrimoFit™. This study is designed to assess the performance, comfort, and ease of use of the PW Male external catheter as compared to the comparator product.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult Male Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Male anatomy at time of enrollment
  • Ability to speak and understand English
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures in this protocol
  • Able to independently void urine
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

  • Urinary incontinence which does not allow the subject to spontaneously void
  • Frequent episodes of bowel incontinence
  • Has Urinary Retention
  • Has any irritation, wound, open lesion, at the application site, on the genitalia, perineum, or sacrum
  • Recent surgery of the external urogenital tract, penis, or pubic area
  • Not able to comply with study procedures independently without required assistance
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude them from participating in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05955560). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search