Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=11 Treatment

Proof-of-concept Study With NVDX3 for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

Distal Radius Fractures

Enrolled (actual)
11
Serious AEs
10.0%
Results posted
Jan 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Safety: Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and NVDX3-related TEAEs — 1; 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
NVDX3 (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Novadip Biosciences
Primary completion
Dec 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Safety: Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and NVDX3-related TEAEs
1; 1
SECONDARY
Safety: Serious TEAEs and NVDX3-related TEAEs
1; 0
SECONDARY
Safety: Serious TEAEs and NVDX3-related TEAEs
1; 0
SECONDARY
Safety: TEAEs
7; 8; 10
SECONDARY
Safety: Related and Unexpected TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
1; 0; 10; 1
SECONDARY
Safety: TEAEs of Special Interest
1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on Computed Tomography (CT) Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Formation
0; 0; 0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Union
0; 0; 0; 1; 8
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Bone Remodelling
0; 0; 9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Radiological Assessments on X-ray Data - Evaluation of Total Extended Lane and Sandhu Score
11.9
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Grip Strength
93.3; 93.3
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Grip Strength
93.3; 93.3
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Grip Strength
93.3; 93.3
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Grip Strength
93.3; 93.3
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Grip Strength
93.3; 93.3
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS)
81.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
13.44; -63.31
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
13.44; -63.31
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
13.44; -63.31
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
13.44; -63.31
SECONDARY
Efficacy: Clinical Assessments - Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
13.44; -63.31
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1
SECONDARY
Efficacy: NRS-pain
1.2; -3.1

Summary

Prospective, single arm, monocentric clinical study to test NVDX3 in patients suffering from distal radius fracture. NVDX3 will be implanted during a single surgical intervention.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female patients within the age range of ≥18 years to ≤80 years.
  • Patient diagnosed with DRF with confirmed:
  • Classification AO/ATO: C2 and C3 - Intra-articular & multifragmentation.
  • Estimated volume of the targeted bone void should not exceed 5cc.
  • Availability of diagnostic AP and LAT X-ray or CT scan.
  • Patient can undergo the targetted surgical intervention within 7 days post-DRF diagnosis.
  • Patient fulfills criteria for undergoing a surgical intervention.
  • Patient has understood and accepted to participate in the study according to all study procedures by signing the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Open DRF or closed DRF with increased infection risk.
  • Injury to the median nerve.
  • Previous fracture of the target distal radius.
  • Documented disease limiting mobility and functional assessments (eg. Grip strength test).
  • Dependency on crutches or any comparable walking aids.
  • Patient is overweight, has a BMI ≥35.
  • Presence of clinically significant infection at the target implant site or systemic infection.
  • History of allergic reaction or any anticipated hypersensitivity to any of the anticipated:
  • Osteosynthesis materials (PEEK plate and screws).
  • Anesthetic agents.
  • Components of the NVDX3 implant.
  • Presence of any auto-immune disease, with exception of well controlled diabetes type-1 or II, or auto-immune thyroid disorders.
  • Positive serology for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HBcAb and/or HBsAg.
  • Presence of an active tumor.
  • Documented metabolic bone disease or any disorder, such as but not limited to high-risk osteoporosis, that could interfere with the bone healing and bone metabolism.
  • Chronic, ongoing, or planned use of medications that might affect bone metabolism or bone quality such as bisphosphonates, steroids, methotrexate, anticoagulants, immunosuppressants or immunotherapy.
  • Excessive smoking, history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within the 12 months prior to screening.
  • Any history of experimental therapy with another investigational drug within 60 days prior to screening.
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) not agreeing to use an effective method of birth control3 during the course of the study. Note: WOCBP including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within 1 year prior to surgery have to have a negative pregnancy test before entering in the study.
  • Any other psychosocial, mental and physical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the trial conduct, the patient's compliance or influence interpretation of the results.
  • Patient with historically elevated radiation exposure levels that could in the opinion of the investigator have introduced unacceptable radiation risks for the patient, when being accumulated with the radiological examinations planned in this study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05987033). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search