Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=8 Health Services Research

Tele-video to Improve Daily Activity

Physical Inactivity

Enrolled (actual)
8
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation — 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Primary completion
Nov 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
1
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Member Participation
3
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Individual Activity Participation
5.8
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Group Activity Participation
3.5
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Total Activity Participation
9.38
PRIMARY
Process Outcome - Number Acitivites Via Zoom
9.38
SECONDARY
Change in Self-reported Physical Activity
0.20
SECONDARY
Change in Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity
-0.05
SECONDARY
Change in Pain Interference
-0.43
SECONDARY
Change in Pain Intensity
-1.20
SECONDARY
Change in Physical Function Difficulty
0.25
SECONDARY
Change in Self-efficacy in Activity
-0.10
SECONDARY
Change in Percentage of Other Participants Known
50
SECONDARY
Change in Respect Level of Other Participants
0.37
SECONDARY
Change in Sedentary Behavior
46.45
SECONDARY
Change in Number of Steps
-85.5

Summary

This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. The intervention is called Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (T-VIDA) and will be administered with two cohorts of residents in a single community. The study has two main goals: 1) To determine if an OT-led program administered remotely over the internet using Zoom is useful in helping residents increase their physical activity; and 2) to determine if involving respected members of the community in the program as Advisory Committee members has an impact on how much other residents participate in program activities and engage in behaviors discussed. The OT intervention will be comprised of a combination of adapted components from multiple evidence-based interventions including individual meetings with an OT and OT-led group sessions. To evaluate the intervention pre- and post-program interviews will be conducted with participants over the phone, and activity monitoring will be conducted after both the pre- and post-program interviews for 7-days using an activity monitoring device. The following hypotheses will be tested: 1) at least 75% (3 of 4) of identified residents will accept the invitation to serve on the Advisory Committee; 2) Advisory Committee Members will attend at least 2 of 3 committee meetings; 3) Participants will on average participate in at least 70% (7 of 10) of intervention activities; 4) Residents knowing one or more committee members at baseline will participate in more intervention activities compared to those who do not; and 5) The influence of knowing a committee member on participation will be greater among residents reporting more pain at baseline compared to those reporting less pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • resident of the senior housing community of focus
  • English-proficient
  • ambulatory with or without assistive device (e.g., cane, walker)

Exclusion Criteria

  • requiring use of a wheelchair for ambulation;
  • requiring highly specialized equipment (e.g., spinal cord injury, leg amputation, wound vacuum assisted closure, heavy leg boot);
  • hospitalized within last 3 months;
  • has probable dementia (TICSm score 2 liters);
  • has active mental health condition judged to pose significant barrier to participation; and
  • meets CDC recommendations for physical activity (150+ minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity during typical week).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06007664). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search