Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=230

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy

Pseudophakia

Enrolled (actual)
230
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Binocular DCNVA (Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity) at 40cm — 0.03; 0.01 logMAR

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Visual Acuity (Diagnostic_test); Defocus Curve (Diagnostic_test); Halo and Glare testing (Diagnostic_test); Patient Questionnaires (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Berkeley Eye Center
Primary completion
Apr 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Binocular DCNVA (Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity) at 40cm
0.03; 0.01
SECONDARY
Binocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) Measured at 4m.
-0.06; -0.07
SECONDARY
Binocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) Measured at 60cm.
0.00; 0.00
SECONDARY
Binocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) Measured at 4m.
-0.01; 0.00
SECONDARY
Binocular Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA) Measured at 60cm.
0.00; 0.00
SECONDARY
Binocular Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) Measured at 40cm.
0.03; 0.03
SECONDARY
Binocular Target Corrected Defocus Curve
0.12; 0.09; 0.03; 0.03; -0.01; 0.01
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Satisfaction by IOLSAT Questionnaire.
89; 94
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Dysphotopsias Questionnaire (QUVID).
65; 49; 38; 38; 48; 55
SECONDARY
Post Operative Refraction, Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE).
0.24; 0.23

Summary

Background: * The Tecnis Synergy intraocular lens (IOL) has a claim to allow patients to experience continuous high-contrast vision from far through near even in low-light conditions. * A J&J-sponsored post marketing study done outside of the US claim superiority of range of vision for the Tecnis Synergy IOL over the PanOptix IOL. Hypothesis: * Patients with bilateral Panoptix IOLs have non-inferior distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity compared to patients with bilateral Synergy IOLs in both photopic and mesopic conditions with less glare, haloes, and/or starbursts. Unmet Medical Need: * There is a need to look at patient visual outcomes and the visual disturbance profile comparing trifocal technology with combined EDOF/Bifocal technology in the United States.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Are willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent
  • Are willing and able to complete all required study visits
  • Are more than 40 years of age
  • Patient diagnosed with cataracts both eyes and underwent uncomplicated cataract surgeries
  • Patients with bilateral PanOptix (toric or non-toric)
  • Patients with bilateral Synergy (toric or non-toric)
  • Post-op best Corrected distance Visual Acuity for each eye is logMAR 0.1 (20/25) or better after cataract removal.
  • Post-op residual refractive error +0.50 - -0.50 SE with ≤ 0.75 residual refractive astigmatism in each eye
  • Minimum of two weeks post Yttrium Aluminum Garnet capsulotomy to treat posterior capsular opacification

Exclusion Criteria

  • Corneal dystrophies or degenerations
  • Failure to return for follow up at designed intervals.
  • Any conditions that might affect cataract removal (pseudoexfoliation, posterior polar cataract, Flomax, etc.)
  • Any conditions during surgery that might prolong the cataract removal (capsular tear, inadequate pupil dilation, etc.)
  • Strabismus with or without amblyopia in either eye
  • Previous ocular surgery of any kind
  • History of retinal detachment
  • Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism (as determined by corneal topography) that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the outcome(s) of the study
  • Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g., macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that in the opinion of the investigator is clinically significant
  • Subjects with glaucoma
  • Subjects who have an acute or chronic disease or illness that would confound the results of this investigation (e.g. immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, etc)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06041139). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search