Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30 Other

The R4R Advance Care Planning Pilot Study

Advance Care Planning

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Advance Care Planning Values/Beliefs — 24.9; 26.3 Score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Trauma-Informed Care-adapted and Checklist-guided ACP intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Primary completion
Dec 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Advance Care Planning Values/Beliefs
24.9; 26.3
PRIMARY
Advance Care Planning Processes
29.2; 43.8
PRIMARY
Advance Care Planning Actions
8.6; 12.6
PRIMARY
Implementation Acceptability
29
PRIMARY
Implementation Appropriateness
24
PRIMARY
Implementation Feasability
28

Summary

Affordable housing residents continue to experience multi-faceted insecurity and advance care planning (ACP) challenges even after obtaining secure housing, resulting in significant inequities in quality of care during times of cognitive incapacity. To promote proactive planning for affordable housing residents, this proposal is for a pilot study to test a novel trauma-informed care adapted advance care planning intervention with the following aims: to test initial efficacy of the intervention on ACP outcomes (Aim 1) and determine resident perceptions of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators (Aim 2). These data will support the development of a larger scale study of ACP interventions within a resiliency-based hub model to comprehensively support whole-person care and proactive planning for times of cognitive incapacity.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • an adult (18+) residing in an affordable housing unit that does not have a completed advance directive

Exclusion Criteria

  • inability to provide informed consent or participate in the intervention due to cognitive, auditory, visual impairment or non-English language barrier
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06129149). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search