Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=80 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Comparison of 2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Skin Adhesive and Polyester Mesh for Wound Closure in Total Knee Arthroplasty, A Randomized Controlled Study

OsteoArthritis Knee

Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS) — 20; 21 score on a scale — p=0.481

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Skin adhesive (Dermabond) (Device); skin adhesive + polyester mesh (Dermabond prineo) (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Pooriwat Lertsurawat
Primary completion
Jun 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
13; 15 0.228
SECONDARY
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
13; 15 0.228
SECONDARY
Vancouver Scar Scale
5; 5 0.421
SECONDARY
Wound Leakage
23; 79 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Vancouver Scar Scale
5; 5 0.421

Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled study is to investigate the Efficacy of Using skin adhesive (Dermabond) and skin adhesive with polyester mesh (Dermabond Prineo )for Wound Closure in Total Knee Arthroplasty, The main question it aim to answer 1 Are skin adhesive alone and with Polyester mesh in Total knee arthroplasty different in Patient satisfaction evaluated by POSAS score

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • OA knee need for Total knee arthroplasty
  • Age 50-80 years old

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous surgery of knee
  • History of Keloid, Scar, Psoriasis at the knee
  • History of contact dermatitis with skin adhesive
  • Cognitive impairment
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06232018). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search