Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=317 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Safety and Efficacy Study of 2 Dosing Regimens of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor (rhNGF) Eye Drop Solution Compared With Vehicle in Patients With Dry Eye Disease.

Dry Eye Disease
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06244316 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
317
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Feb 2026
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Symptoms of Dry Eye Assessed by Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Global Score — -19.6; -20.7; -15.5 score on a scale — p==0.076

Summary

Primary objective • To evaluate the efficacy of 5 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL concentrations of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution versus vehicle, in order to demonstrate superiority of at least 1 of the concentrations over vehicle in the improvement of ocular symptoms of dry eye in participants with dry eye disease (DED) Key secondary objectives * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in increasing the number of participants with improved reflex tear production as compared to vehicle at week 4 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving reflex tear production as compared to vehicle at week 4 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving ocular surface integrity (corneal epitheliopathy) as compared to vehicle at week 4 Secondary objectives * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving reflex tear production as compared to vehicle at week 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving tear film stability as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving ocular surface integrity (corneal and conjunctival epitheliopathy) as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving the severity and frequency of dry eye symptoms as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving dry eye symptoms as compared to vehicle at week 4 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving associated symptoms in DED as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving the quality of life in participants with DED as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 * To evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution in improving best corrected visual acuity in DED as compared to vehicle at weeks 4 and 8 Safety objectives * To evaluate safety/tolerability of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution * To evaluate safety of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution * To evaluate tolerability of the new formulation of rhNGF ophthalmic solution

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Symptoms of Dry Eye Assessed by Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Global Score
-19.6; -20.7; -15.5 =0.076
SECONDARY
Key Secondary Outcome: Percentage of Participants Improving to Schirmer-I Test Without Anesthesia ≥ 10 mm/5 Min in the Study Eye at Week 4
11.7; 7.3; 12.1 =0.534
SECONDARY
Key Secondary Outcome: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Schirmer-I Score Without Anesthesia in the Study Eye
3.5; 2.9; 2.9 =0.260
SECONDARY
Key Secondary Outcome: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining (National Eye Institute NEI Scale) in the Study Eye as Assessed by the Investigator
-1.1; -1.0; -0.7 =0.120
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Schirmer-I Score Without Anesthesia in the Study Eye
2.5; 1.7; 3.0 =0.749
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Improving to Schirmer-I Test Without Anesthesia ≥ 10 mm/5min in the Study Eye at Week 8
8.1; 6.4; 10.6 =0.734
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in Fluorescein Tear Break-up Time (fTBUT) in Study Eye
0.3; 0.1; 0.4; 0.1; 0.2; 0.4 =0.636
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Questionnaire's Ocular Pain and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
-1.6; -1.7; -1.7; -1.9; -1.8; -1.9 =0.605
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining (National Eye Institute NEI Scale) in the Study Eye as Assessed by the Investigator
-1.2; -0.9; -0.9 =0.159
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Scores for Severity
-12.2; -12.9; -12.9; -18.7; -20.6; -14.6 =0.597
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Scores for Frequency
-13.4; -13.3; -13.8; -20.4; -20.3; -15.9 =0.558
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Symptoms of Dry Eye Assessed by SANDE Global Score
-12.3; -13.8; -13.4 =0.656
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) Score in Study Eye
1.0; -0.2; 0.3; 0.7; 0.7; 0.6 =0.137
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Incidence of theTreatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall (Ocular and Non-ocular) Assessed Throughout the Study
27; 32; 11; 23; 26; 5
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Frequency of the Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Ocular and Non-ocular) at Participant Level, Assessed Throughout the Study Including run-in Period
11; 20; 5; 10; 6; 0
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Both Eyes (Study Eye and Fellow Eye)
-3.0; -16.9; 10.5; 27.3; -14.9; 11.7
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Vitritis, Retinal or Vitreal Hemorrhages, Retinal or Posterior Vitreal Detachment, Retinal Tears, Maculopathy on Dilated Fundus Exam (DFE) in Both Eyes at Week 8
0; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Cup-to-disc Ratio in Both Eyes
0.02; 0.02; 0.00; 0.02; 0.02; 0.00
SECONDARY
Safety Outcome: Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in Bulbar Conjunctival Redness (VBR 10 Score) in Both Eyes
-2.3; -1.5; -2.7; -2.0; -0.6; -2.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Treatment Due to Tolerability Issues
0; 0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female aged ≥18 years of any race/ethnicity and eye color.
  • A diagnosis of dry eye disease at least 6 months before enrollment (current use or recommended use of artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye).
  • Moderate-to-severe dry eye characterized by the following clinical features:
  • Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire global score ≥50, and
  • Schirmer-I test without anesthesia >2 mm and 0.
  • Medical history of tumor malignancy in the previous 3 years
  • Systemic disease not stabilized within 1 month before the screening visit (e.g., diabetes with glycemia out of range, thyroid malfunction) or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study (e.g., current systemic infections) or with a condition incompatible with the frequent assessment required by the study.
  • History of a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug or chemically related compounds or had a clinically significant allergy to drugs, foods, topical anesthetic eye drop or other local anesthetics or other materials, including ocular vital dyes, tropicamide eye drops, commercial artificial tears.
  • Known or suspected allergy to sesame and other seeds, tree nuts, and/or peanuts, and/or any other component of the new rhNGF formulation.
  • Fertile patients (i.e., not surgically sterilized, or postmenopausal women for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they do not practice abstinence from heterosexual intercourse as per usual and customary lifestyle, or are unwilling to use an acceptable form of contraception such as condom with spermicidal cream or jelly for males, or for females if they meet any one of the following conditions:
  • Currently pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test at screening or baseline visits) or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the treatment phase of the clinical trial.
  • Participant is breastfeeding.
  • Unwilling to use birth control measures such as mechanical barrier methods (spermicide in conjunction with a barrier such as a condom or diaphragm or intrauterine device) during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment period, or,
  • Unwilling to continue to use highly effective birth control measures such as hormonal contraceptives (oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected) during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment period.
  • Any concurrent medical condition that, in the judgment of the principal investigator, might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound the interpretation of the study results, or endanger the participant's well-being.
  • Contact lenses or punctum plug use in either eye during the washout, treatment, and follow-up phases of the study (previous use is not an exclusion criteria but must be removed and discontinued at the Screening visit).
  • Medical history of drug addiction or alcohol abuse (>1 drink /day for women and >2 drinks /day for men following USDA dietary Guidelines 2020-2025).
  • Any prior ocular surgery, including but not limited to amniotic membrane transplant, refractive [PTK (Excimer Laser Phototherapeutic Keratectomy) / LASIK (Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis) / Epi-LASIK (Epithelial Laser In Situ Keratomileusis) / LASEK (Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy) / SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction)], palpebral, cataract surgery, trabeculectomy, vitrectomy and Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation (PRP) within 90 days before the screening visit.
  • Participation in a clinical trial with a new active substance, including medical devices, during the previous 60 days.
  • Participation in another clinical trial study at the same time as the present study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06244316). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search