Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=598

Dynamic Data-Driven Management of Atrial Fibrillation Using Implantable Cardiac Monitors: The MONITOR-AF Study

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06352060 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
598
Serious AEs
5.2%
Results posted
Apr 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Patients With Freedom From AF, OAC and AAD Use — 257; 185; 208; 118 Participants

Summary

Observational, multi-center, retrospective study to evaluate the use of ICM (implantable cardiac monitor) versus traditional, non-ICM (non-implantable cardiac monitor) methods such as ECGs (electrocardiogram), Holter, and mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) units.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Patients With Freedom From AF, OAC and AAD Use
257; 185; 208; 118; 230; 109
SECONDARY
Clinical Outcomes in Participants With ICM and Non-ICM Participants
299; 180; 299; 189; 233; 216
SECONDARY
Total CV-related Hospital Stay Duration, Days
3.5; 7.4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients > 18 years of age
  • Present for management of AF
  • ICM is inserted at the discretion of the treating physician

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients 12 months
  • CA performed for AF before ICM implant
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06352060). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search