N/A
N=50
Safety-Enhancing Motor Vehicle Child Safety Seat
Motor Vehicle Injury · Safety Issues
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06384989 ↗Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Overall Correct Use of Load Leg — 18 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Child restraint system with load leg feature (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Minnesota HealthSolutions
- Primary completion
- Jul 2024
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Overall Correct Use of Load Leg |
18 | — |
| PRIMARY Attempt to Use Load Leg Without Prompting |
27 | — |
| PRIMARY Correct Load Leg Length |
35 | — |
| PRIMARY Correct Load Leg Angle |
37 | — |
| SECONDARY Correct Understanding of Load Leg's Purpose |
48 | — |
| SECONDARY Participants Who Like Having the Load Leg |
28 | — |
Summary
This study aims to assess the usability of a load leg design for caregivers who must install the child safety seat into a vehicle. The specific aims are to quantify any errors committed by the participants while installing the car seat and to assess participants' opinions on the car seat's load leg design.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Age 18 or older
- Be a care provider to a child who is up to 4 years of age
- Have installed a child safety seat in the last 2 years
- Able to lift and install a child safety seat into a vehicle
- English-speaking (because consent forms and explanation will be given in English)
Exclusion Criteria
- Not meeting any of the above
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06384989). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.