Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=32 Basic Science

Comparison of Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS) to Capnography for Respiratory Rate (RR)

Respiratory Monitoring

Enrolled (actual)
32
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Respiratory Rate Accuracy Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices — .63 Breath Per Minute

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Makani Science
Primary completion
Jul 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Respiratory Rate Accuracy Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices
.63
SECONDARY
Respiratory Rate Bias Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices
-.40
SECONDARY
Makani Science System Performance After Simulated Breathing Artifacts
.57; -.38
SECONDARY
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Right Side
.67; -.67
SECONDARY
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Left Side
1.49; -1.49
SECONDARY
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying in the Reclined Position
1.38; -1.25

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (capnography) in human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Between age of 22-99
  • BMI between 15 and 40 kg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical history of serious symptomatic, cardiac, or pulmonary disease.
  • History of serious skin irritation (severe rash or blisters) caused by medical adhesives (tape).
  • Cannot lay still for one (1) hour.
  • Cannot give written informed consent.
  • Unable to follow instructions.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06521385). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search