N/A
N=44
The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.
BLS Competence · Debriefing
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06624449 ↗Enrolled (actual)
44
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Nov 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Basic Life Support Competence — 9.45; 10.04; 14.63; 14.54 score on a scale — p=<0.05
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Cold debriefing (Behavioral); Hot Debriefing (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
- Primary completion
- Mar 2024
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Basic Life Support Competence |
9.45; 10.04; 14.63; 14.54 | <0.05 sig |
| SECONDARY Debriefing Experience Scale |
95.68; 93.63; 93.86; 92.18 | — |
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training.
The study aims to:
* Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students.
* Identify which debriefing method students prefer.
Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing.
* Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Junior or senior nursing students (i.e., in their third or fourth year of the BSN degree).
Exclusion Criteria
- Nursing students who are not junior or senior.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06624449). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.