N/A N=70 Pivotal Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
Abdominal Fat
Primary: Difference in Circumferential Measurement Related to Sham and Therapeutic Group at 12 Weeks Post-treatment — 1.9; 0 cm
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=44 The Trusculpt (Radio Frequency) Device For Thigh Circumference Reduction
Body Fat
Primary: Change of Thigh Circumference From Baseline — .98; .32 cm
N/A N=54 Study of Low Level Laser Light Therapy on Circumference Reduction
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Change in Combined Circumference Measurements — -5.36 inches — p=<.0001
N/A N=16 VelaShape III & UltraShape Power for Thigh Circumference Reduction
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Circumference Change in the Thighs at the 12-week Follow-up Compared to Baseline Measurements — -2.8 centimeter
N/A N=62 Efficacy Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Light Therapy on Reducing Upper Arm Circumference
Body Contouring
Primary: Change in Combined Upper Arm Circumference Measurements From Baseline to Endpoint — 18; 1 participants
N/A N=52 Low-Frequency, High-Intensity Ultrasound for Waist Circumference Reduction
Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat
Primary: Waist Circumference Change — -2.03 Inches
N/A N=62 UltraShape Power for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Excess Abdominal Fat
Primary: Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound — -10.5 percentage change
N/A N=53 Study of Low Level Laser Therapy to Reduce Body Circumference in Obese Individuals
Obesity
Primary: Difference in the Proportion of Primary Outcome Successes Between Treatment Groups for Change in Combined Circumference Measurements — 20; 3 participants — p=<0.00005
N/A N=70 SlimShape Device for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in Fat Thickness at Final Follow-up Compared to Baseline — -1.76 millimeters
N/A N=81 Efficacy and Safety of the BeShape One Device for Non-invasive Waist Circumference Reduction
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: Change in Waist Circumference — -1.87 cm — p=<0.0001
N/A N=75 Trim II for Noninvasive Lipolysis and Circumference Reduction of Abdomen.
Circumference Reduction of Abdomen
Primary: Evaluation of Change in Abdomen Circumference Using Tape Measurements in cm at the 3 Months Follow-up Visit Comparing to Baseline. — 89.5 CM
N/A N=25 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Flanks of Patients With Sharp Body Curvature
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq System for Non-invasive Fat Reduction in Subjects With Greater Flank Curvature. — 0; 0 UADEs
N/A N=60 LLLT for Reducing Waste Circumference and Weight
Weight Loss
Primary: Change in Weight — -0.5; -0.9; -0.6 Kg — p=0.723
N/A N=45 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Inner Thighs
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Pre-Treatment Images Correctly Identified by Reviewers — 90.5 percentage of correct identifications
N/A N=19 Fat Layer Reduction in the Lateral Thighs Using CoolSculpting
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the Outer Thighs — 8; 0 events
N/A N=68 CONFORM: Rotational Fractional Resection for Submental Contouring
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants With a Reduction of Submental Skin Area ≥ 20 mm^2 — 49 Participants
N/A N=2 The PREFORM Study: Rotational Fractional Resection for Submental Contouring
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade Improvement on the Submental Skin Laxity Scale — 2 Participants
N/A N=19 34mm Cuff Study for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Primary: Number of Participants With Proximal Type I Endoleak at Each Timepoint — 1; 0; 0; 0 Participants
N/A N=15 Pilot Study on The Flanks of Asian Patients
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Pre-treatment Images Correctly Identified — 32 photos
N/A N=60 Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Waist Circumference in Adults
Abdominal Obesity
Primary: Waist Circumference — 87.0; 89.4 cm
N/A N=60 Non-Invasive Reduction of Abdominal Fat
Fat Reduction
Primary: Proportion of Pre-treatment Images Correctly Identified — 128 photos — p=<0.001
N/A N=40 Feasibility Study of a Belt Applicator
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound The Change in Fat Layer Thickness in the Treated Outer Thigh — -0.25 cm
N/A N=60 Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in the Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area — 4 incidence of device- and/or procedure AE
N/A N=36 Force Modulating Tissue Bridges for Closure of Vertical Scars in Breast Reduction
Surgical Incision
Primary: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)- Patient Scores 12M — 1.09; 1.22; 1.3; 1.87 score on a scale
N/A N=150 A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
Circumcision
Primary: Intraoperative Duration — 22.6; 13.0; 25.0; 28.6 minutes
N/A N=14 Fat Reduction in the Submandibular/Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Pre-Treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 11 photos
N/A N=20 CoolSculpting in the Abdomen Using Applicator With and Without CCI
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Accurately Identified Pre-treatment Photos — 33; 23; 50; 23 photos
N/A N=100 Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
Circumcision
Primary: Intraoperative Duration — 9.0; 22.6 Min
N/A N=45 CoolSculpting of the Flank With Alternate Treatment Parameters
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: The Number of Device and/or Procedure-Related Adverse Events — 12 device or procedure-related AEs
N/A N=44 Study of Over-The-Counter Use of Low Level Laser Light Therapy for Body Contouring of the Waist, Hips and Thighs
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Lay End User Ability to Correctly Choose Suitably Qualified Individuals to Get the ZERONA Z6 Treatments — 22 participants