Phase 1 N=59 Clinical Evaluation of the Photoallergy Potential of Xenaderm Ointment
Healthy
Primary: Frequency Distribution of Skin Irritation Scores — 39; 10; 3; 0 Scores on a scale
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 1 N=58 Evaluation of Potential Development of Photoallergic Skin Reaction After Use of MC2-01 Cream
Photoallergy
Primary: Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01…
Phase 1 N=61 A 6-Week Study to Evaluate the Photoallergic Potential of Diacerein 1% Ointment in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy
Primary: Observed Photoallergy (Photosensitization): Number of Skin Sites by Maximum Total Irritation Score — 10; 3; 1; 0 Number of affected skin sites
N/A N=37 A Photoxicity and Photoallergy Study of a Developmental Face Cream, Serum and Lotion
Skin Care
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Photo-initiated Potential Sensitization Reaction — 0; 0; 0; 0 Participants
N/A N=7 Photocil (Topical) for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis
Primary: Number of Pruritus Events in Last 30 Days — 7.4; 1.9 Events
Phase 1 N=34 A 4-Day Study to Evaluate the Photoxicity of Diacerein 1% Topical Ointment in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy
Primary: Observed Phototoxicity — 0.15; 0.15; 0.00; 0.00 Score on a scale — p=1.0000
N/A N=36 To Assess the Photosensitisation and Photoallergy Potential of a Cosmetic Facial Product in Healthy Participants
Skin Care
Primary: Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 2 — 0; 0 Score on scale
Phase 1 N=38 Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment
Healthy
Primary: Skin Reaction Score — 0.4; 0.5; 0.1; 0.4 units on a scale
Phase 1 N=259 Contact Sensitization Potential of 828 Ointment
Healthy Volunteers
Primary: Number of Participants That Exhibited a Score Less Than 1.5 on the Jordan-King Scale — 205 participants
Phase 3 N=20 The Role of Interleukin-1 Beta Targeted Therapy for Patients Suffering From Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Primary: Clinical Reaction — 0; 0; 12; 8 Participants
Phase 3 N=137 Study to Find Out if Cream V61-044 Used to Treat Fungal Infections Causes an Allergic Skin Reaction to Sunlight in Healthy Participants
Dermatitis, Photoallergic
Primary: Photoallergic Reaction Evaluation Reported as Number of Test Site With Different Erythema Score During Challenge Phase - All Treated Subjects — 325; 24; 343; 6 Test site
Phase 2 N=12 Study of Apremilast in Atopic or Contact Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis · Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Primary: Number of Patients Achieving an Improvement (Decrease) in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by Two or More Points — 2 participants
Phase 4 N=20 A Study for a Topical Medication Versus Placebo in Patients With Hand Dermatitis
Hand Dermatitis
Primary: Primary Outcome Measure for Efficacy (IGA) — 2.33; 2.20; 2.43; 2 score on a scale
Phase 2 N=14 Daylight-mediated Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses:Comparing 0.2%HAL With 16%MAL
Actinic Keratoses
Primary: Histological Lesion Clearance — 38.5; 69.2 percentage of complete histological clea
Phase 1 N=35 Evaluation of Potential Phototoxicity Skin Reaction After Use of MC2-01 Cream
Phototoxicity
Primary: Within-subject Comparison and Evaluator Rating of Possible Dermal Reactions (Erythema, Edema and Other Signs of Cutaneous Irritation), After Application of MC2-01 Cream…
Phase 2 N=16 Evaluation of the Protection Activity of Microfine Titanium Dioxide (Ti02), Pigmentary Ti02 and Bisoctrizole and Their Combinations in Voluntary Patients With Idiopathic Solar Urticaria (SU)
Idiopathic Solar Urticaria
Primary: Assessment of the Minimal Urticaria Dose (MUD) on Each Test Site, After Application of the Test Products — 4.33; 3.93; 3.80; 3.67 Photodermatosis Protection Factor
N/A N=50 Red Grape Polyphenol Oral Administration to Women Affected by Nickel-mediated Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Primary: Evaluation of Serum Biomarker Concentrations at the Time of Enrollment (T0) — 14.53; 16.03; 109.1; 110.7 pg/ml
Phase 4 N=24 Evaluating Treatment Resistant Dermatitis TaroIIR
Atopic Dermatitis · Psoriasis
Primary: Investigator Global Assessment- Atopic Dermatitis — 1.7; 1.5 units on a scale
Phase 1 N=24 Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
Actinic Keratoses
Primary: Change in Treatment Symptoms — 3.9; 0.5; 0.37 score on a scale
Phase 2 N=32 Comparison of Metvix Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Its Vehicle in the Treatment of Photoaged Skin
Photoaged Skin
Primary: Number of Participants With Severity of Photodamage — 0; 0; 1; 0 Participants
Phase 1 N=59 Cumulative Irritation Potential of 828 Ointment
Healthy Volunteers
Primary: Presence of Cumulative Irritation — 163.0; 109.0; 2073.0 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=30 Study of Daylight Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid for Actinic Keratoses
Actinic Keratosis
Primary: Percent Change in the Number of Actinic Keratoses — -75 % change in number of actinic keratoses
Phase 4 N=14 Daylight-PDT for AKs: Comparing Two Photosensitizers (BF-200 ALA and MAL)
Multiple Actinic Keratoses
Primary: Histological Lesion Clearance — 61.5; 38.5 percentage of complete clearance — p=0.375
Phase 2 N=48 Clinical Evaluation of T.R.U.E. TEST® Panel 3.2 Allergens: Dose Response
Contact Dermatitis
Primary: Diagnostic Performance: Optimal Test Allergen Concentration — 38.1; 47.6; 52.4; 30.8 percentage of participants
N/A N=10 Photodynamic Therapy With Levulan® +/- Topical Retinoid Pre-Treatment In The Treatment Of Actinic Keratoses
ACTINIC KERATOSES
Primary: Change in Lesion Counts in 25 cm2 Target Area Relative to Baseline. — -72; -37.5 lesions
Phase 3 N=32 Study to Learn More About the Potential of Antifungal Cream V61-044 Containing Trolamine to Cause Irritant Reaction of the Skin to Ultra Violet Light in Healthy Human Subjects
Dermatitis, Phototoxic
Primary: Phototoxic Reaction Evaluation Reported as Number of Test Site With Different Erythema Score — 77; 10; 85; 2 Test site
Phase 4 N=206 Neo-Synalar Modified 48 Hour Patch Test
Allergy
Primary: Evidence of Pre-Existing Sensitization by Use of the Erythemal Scoring Scale (ESS) — 0 percentage of patients w allergic rxn
Phase 3 N=235 Clinical Evaluation of T.R.U.E. TEST® : Safety and Efficacy
Contact Dermatitis
Primary: Diagnostic Performance: Concordance Between Investigational Allergen and Reference Allergen at Day 21 — 78.9 percentage of concordant responses
N/A N=12 Photocil (Topical) for the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris
Psoriasis
Primary: Percent Lesion Clearance — 75.7; 8 Percent Clearance
Early Phase 1 N=50 Comparison of Efficacy of Methotrexate and Azathioprine in Patients With Chronic Actinic Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chronic Actinic Dermatitis
Primary: 50% Reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI-50) — 12; 9 Participants