N/A N=53 Performance Evaluation of Reusable Contact Lenses When Worn For One Month By Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Myopia · Hyperopia
Primary: Lens Handling on Removal — 84; 89 score on a scale
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=25 Contact Lens Adaptation in Neophytes
Contact Lens Comfort
Primary: Between-Group Difference in Eye Comfort as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) — 10.8; 16.3 Units on a Scale — p=0.83
N/A N=67 Evaluation of Monthly Replacement Lenses in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers Who Report Frequent Digital Devise Use
Ametropia
Primary: Subjective Ratings on Lens Handling on Removal — 8.3; 8.8 Units on scale
N/A N=90 Overall Performance of a 1-day Silicone Hydrogel Lens When Habitual Soft Lens Wearers Are Refit
Myopia
Primary: Comfort — 83; 77; 83; 83 units on a scale
N/A N=74 Clinical Evaluation of Reusable Soft Contact Lenses
Myopia
Primary: Visual Acuity — -0.07; -0.13 logMAR
N/A N=30 Impact of Soft Contact Lenses on Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds
Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds
Primary: Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds (LIPCOF) — 1.95; 1.75; 1.70; 1.40 Score
N/A N=66 Evaluation of the Performance of Monthly Replacement Sphere Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Myopia · Hyperopia
Primary: Subjective Ratings on Lens Handling on Removal — 8.6; 8.5 units on a scale
N/A N=76 One Month Daily Wear Clinical Evaluation of New Prototype Contact Lenses in Habitual and Neophyte Contact Lens Wearers
Visual Correction
Primary: Corneal Staining (Area) — 11.76; 5.79; 4.17; 6.18 Units on a scale
N/A N=49 Performance Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Astigmatism
Primary: Lens Handling on Removal — 89; 91 units on a scale
N/A N=22 Efficacy of Scleral Contact Lenses for Daily Wear for Regular and Irregular Refractive Errors Compared to Habitually Worn Scleral Lenses
Scleral Lens Wearers
Primary: The Primary Endpoint of the Study is the Overall Satisfaction and Desire to Continue Wearing the Study Lenses — 15; 2; 4 Participants
N/A N=40 Clinical Performance of Habitual Wearers of Bioclear 1-day Lenses When Refitted With Biomedics 1-day Extra for 1 Week
Myopia · Hyperopia
Primary: Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon IV 1 and Ocufilcon D — 58; 70; 98; 98 percentage of eyes
N/A N=66 Clinical Assessment of a Daily Wear Monthly Replacement Soft Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
Myopia
Primary: Mean Distance Visual Acuity (logMAR) With Study Lenses — -0.11; -0.13; -0.12; -0.13 logMAR
N/A N=35 Wear Experience With Daily Contact Lenses Over a Long Day
Contact Lens
Primary: Subjective Overall Comfort as Assessed Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — 93 units on a scale
N/A N=177 Evaluation of a Multi-Purpose Solution
Contact Lens Solutions
Primary: Antimicrobial Efficacy — 114; 219; 0; 3 Eyes
N/A N=10 Novel Multifocal Soft Contact Lens Study
Myopia
Primary: Distance Visual Acuity — -0.13; -0.12 logMAR
N/A N=71 Evaluation of Wear Experience With One Week Reusable Contact Lenses in Habitual Two Week Reusable Lens Wearers
Myopia
Primary: Subjective Assessment of Lens Wear Experience — 10 Scores on a scale
N/A N=69 Performance Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in Habitual Lens Wearers Who Use Digital Devices Frequently
Myopia
Primary: Lens Handling on Removal — 90; 95 Units on a scale
N/A N=205 Longitudinal Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel (LASH) Study
Corneal Infiltrates
Primary: Cumulative Incidence of Corneal Inflammatory Events — 26.7 annual incidence per 100 subjects
N/A N=199 Evaluating Soft Contact Lens Prototypes for Myopia Control
Visual Acuity
Primary: Axial Length — 0.119; 0.135; 0.079; 0.189 mm
N/A N=22 Clinical Performance of a Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Following Six Nights of Extended Wear
Refractive Errors
Primary: Visual Acuity (VA) With Study Lenses, Collected by Eye — -0.04; -0.06; -0.06; -0.09 logMAR
N/A N=119 Clinical Evaluation of a Daily Wear Frequent Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Lens
Refractive Errors
Primary: Distance Visual Acuity (VA) With Study Lenses - Completed Eyes — -0.06; -0.06; -0.06; -0.05 logMAR
N/A N=314 Clinical Trial of Several Contact Lenses in Extended Wear
Myopia
Primary: Incidence of Corneal Infiltrative Events — 31; 16; 10; 8 percentage of participants
N/A N=35 Performance of DAILIES TOTAL1 Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in Habitual Soft Lens Wearers Who Report Substantial Digital Device Use
Myopia
Primary: Subjective Rating of Comfort After 8 Hours or More of Digital Device Use — 96 score on a scale
N/A N=120 A Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
Visual Acuity
Primary: Subjective Overall Comfort — 75.5; 70.8 units on a scale
N/A N=816 Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lens 7-Day Extended Wear Basis
Myopia
Primary: High Contrast Visual Acuity — -0.065; -0.047 logMAR
N/A N=80 Clinical Performance of a New Daily Disposable Contact Lens Worn in an Established Contact Lens Wearing Population
Refractive Error · Myopia
Primary: Limbal Hyperemia — 34.0967; 31.0920 units on a scale
N/A N=60 Corneal Staining and Physiological Compromise After Eight Hours of Soft Contact Lens Wear
Contact Lens-induced Corneal Fluorescein Staining
Primary: The Primary Outcome Measure Will be Corneal Epithelial Dye Diffusion Rate in Nanometers Per Second, for the Test and Control Eyes. — 0.0567; 0.0583 nanometers per second
N/A N=36 Clinical Performance Assessment of a Daily Wear Monthly Replacement Soft Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
Refractive Errors
Primary: Distance VA (logMAR) With Study Lenses — -0.13; -0.14 logMAR
N/A N=72 Ocular Comfort and the "Aging" Lens (ERBIUM)
Refractive Error
Primary: Phase 3: Ocular Comfort, Lens Age 1 Day, Hour 1 — 76; 88 Units on a scale
N/A N=30 Comparing a Monthly Replacement Lens Versus a Daily Disposable Lens
Myopia
Primary: Lens Handling at Insertion — 83; 93 score on a scale