30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved
Improvement in Skin Laxity of the Lower Face and Submentum
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in Lower Face and Submental Skin Laxity at Day 90 — 54.2; 47.0 percentage of subjects
Skin Laxity
Primary: Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area — -0.18; -017 percent change
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue
Skin Laxity
Primary: Tissue Lift at the Submental Area Measuring >/= 20 mm2 — 56.9 percentage of participants — p=0.05
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Cheek · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Upper Neck · Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Cheek
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue on the Lower Face and Submental Regions. — 68.60 percentage of participants improved
Skin Aging
Primary: Improvement in Laxity — 0.6; 1.0; 0.9; 1.3 units on a scale
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity Under the Chin · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Neck
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Submental (Under the Chin) and Neck Tissue Area at Day 90 Post-treatment — -14.4; -7.9; -22.3 square…
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: The Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least a 1-grade Improvement on the Clinician Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) at the Final Follow-up Visit When…
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
Lax Skin
Primary: Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement Measured By Independent Photographic Review — 6; 52 Participants — p=<0.0001
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
Laxity; Skin
Primary: Evaluate Change in Skin Appearance — 80.7 percentage of participants
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Number of Participants With Improvement in Skin Laxity in Submental Region and Neck at Day 90 — 8 Participants
Skin Laxity · Tissue Degeneration · Tissue Breakdown
Primary: Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin) — 1.7; 0.5; 1.5; 0.5 units on a scale
Aging
Primary: Hydration Level — 53.19; 46.75 AU (arbitrary unit) — p=<0.05
Facial and Neck Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of the Jowls and/or Neck Laxity — 22; 10; 1; 11 participants
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area — 4 incidence of device- and/or procedure AE
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants With a Reduction of Submental Skin Area ≥ 20 mm^2 — 49 Participants
Skin Laxity
Primary: Subjects' Assessment of Pain During Treatment With Lower Energy Settings — 4.5; 6.0; 5.6; 3.7 units on a scale
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
Skin Laxity
Primary: Lifting and Tightening of Skin as Determined by Masked Assessment of Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs. — 40; 30; 33 percentage of participants improved
Facial and Neck Rhytides
Primary: Change in Neck and Facial Wrinkles Using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment — 74 percentage of participants
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Pre-Treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 11 photos
Glabellar Frown Lines · Canthal Lines
Primary: Responders Rate Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Maximum Frown (Glabellar Lines) — 100 percentage of participants
Eyebrow Lift · Improved Appearance of the Face and Neck
Primary: Percentage of Treated Subjects With Eyebrow Lift at Day 90 — 80.0; 67.5 percentage of subjects
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) — 0 Participants
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade Improvement on the Submental Skin Laxity Scale — 2 Participants
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) 1-grade Response — 58.3; 62.3; 34.5 percentage of participants — p=<0.001