N/A N=16 Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 4 N=30 Emervel for the Correction of Lower Face Wrinkles & Folds
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
N/A N=110 Saypha® Volume LIdocaine in Nasolabial Folds
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
N/A N=32 Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved
Phase 4 N=58 Sequential Treatment With BELKYRA® Then Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine for Overall Improvement in Jawline Contour
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
N/A N=62 Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Fold, Hypoplastic
Primary: NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change — -1.50 score on a scale
N/A N=175 Restylane Defyne Compared to Restylane for Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Population
Primary: Percentage of Responders, Defined by at Least 1-point Improvement From Baseline on the WSRS. — 72.9; 72.8 percentage of subjects
N/A N=148 Restylane Defyne for Correction of Chin Retrusion
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants (Responders) With At Least 1-Point Improvement From Baseline on the GCRS, as Assessed by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 6 ([Baseline…
Phase 2 N=15 Pilot Evaluation of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score, Between Pre-treatment and 12 Weeks Post-treatment. — 1.13 units on a scale
N/A N=52 Lifting and Tightening of the Face in Subjects With Skin of Darker Color
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue
N/A N=126 A Safety and Effectiveness Study of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC Versus Control for Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-Point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS) — 2.6; 2.6; 1.4; 1.3 Scores on a Scale
N/A N=201 Reliability of a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale and Lower Facial Shape Classification
Healthy Volunteers
Primary: Inter-rater Reliability Using a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale (MMPS) — 0.728; 0.711 Kendall's W
N/A N=147 TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action, TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines, and Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Primary: Non-inferiority of the Delta of TEOSYAL® RHA GA and TEOSYAL® RHA DL Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the Wrinkle Severity…
Phase 4 N=18 Rejuvenation of the Lower Eyelid Using a Combination of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers - a Pilot Study
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: The Primary Objective of This Study is to Determine the Efficacy and Longevity of the Use of Restylane® and Perlane® in Combination for the Rejuvenation of the…
Phase 3 N=235 MT10109L in the Treatment of Lateral Canthal Lines
Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND…
Phase 4 N=53 A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine for Dynamic Radial Cheek Line Skin Depressions
Cheek Line Depressions
Primary: Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Improved and Not Improved) of Their Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Participant Using the Global…
Phase 3 N=902 Long-term Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines and Lateral Canthal Lines
Glabellar Lines · Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Grade/Level 0 or 1 on the GL Investigator Scales at Maximum Frown — 769 Participants
N/A N=270 Effectiveness and Safety of Princess FILLER Lidocaine in Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: Responder Status Based on Independent Evaluating Investigator Live Assessment at Week 24 - Full Analysis Dataset — 222; 221 Participants — p=<0.0001
Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Phase 3 N=118 Multicenter Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Dermal Filler, Belotero®.
Facial Wrinkles
Primary: Adjusted (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS) Score of Each Nasolabial Fold (NLF) as Determined by the Blinded Evaluator at Week 12…
Phase 3 N=377 BOTOX® Treatment for Adults With a Wide Lower Face Due to Masseter Muscle Prominence
Masseter Muscle Prominence
Primary: Achievement of ≥ 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale (MMPS) at Day 90 — 2.2; 51.2 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001
N/A N=118 TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep and Perlane-L® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Primary: Non-inferiority of the Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe…
N/A N=140 Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft Lidocaine for Jawline Definition
Jawline Definition
Primary: Percentage of Responders Having At Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both Jawlines Concurrently Based on Galderma Jawline Scale (GJS) at Month 3 as Assessed…
N/A N=20 Assess the Impact of Lip Rejuvenation on Projected First Impressions and Mood Perceptions
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
Phase 3 N=917 Safety and Efficacy Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Crow's Feet Lines and Frown Lines
Facial Rhytides · Crow's Feet Lines · Glabellar Lines
Primary: Percentage of Responders Based on Composite Facial Wrinkle Scale Assessment of Crow's Feet Line Severity at Maximum Smile — 21.3; 20.6; 0.0 Percentage of participants
N/A N=103 Evaluation of the Ulthera™ System for Obtaining Lift and Tightening of the Cheek Tissue
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Cheek · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Upper Neck · Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Cheek
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue on the Lower Face and Submental Regions. — 68.60 percentage of participants improved
N/A N=20 Perioral Rejuvenation and Upper Lip Enhancement
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Phase 3 N=25 Assess Aesthetic Improvement With QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines
Glabellar Frown Lines · Canthal Lines
Primary: Responders Rate Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Maximum Frown (Glabellar Lines) — 100 percentage of participants
Phase 4 N=32 Juvederm Ultra With Lidocaine Compared With Restylane for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Procedural Pain Score — 2.0; 4.1 units on a scale
N/A N=93 Safety and Effectiveness of Belotero® in Subjects With Fitzpatrick Phototypes IV Through VI
Facial Wrinkles
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With Product-related Adverse Events. — 71; 72 percentage of subjects with AEs.