N/A N=16 VelaShape III & UltraShape Power for Thigh Circumference Reduction
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Circumference Change in the Thighs at the 12-week Follow-up Compared to Baseline Measurements — -2.8 centimeter
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=54 Study of Low Level Laser Light Therapy on Circumference Reduction
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Change in Combined Circumference Measurements — -5.36 inches — p=<.0001
N/A N=45 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Inner Thighs
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Pre-Treatment Images Correctly Identified by Reviewers — 90.5 percentage of correct identifications
N/A N=70 SlimShape Device for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in Fat Thickness at Final Follow-up Compared to Baseline — -1.76 millimeters
N/A N=44 The Trusculpt (Radio Frequency) Device For Thigh Circumference Reduction
Body Fat
Primary: Change of Thigh Circumference From Baseline — .98; .32 cm
N/A N=75 Trim II for Noninvasive Lipolysis and Circumference Reduction of Abdomen.
Circumference Reduction of Abdomen
Primary: Evaluation of Change in Abdomen Circumference Using Tape Measurements in cm at the 3 Months Follow-up Visit Comparing to Baseline. — 89.5 CM
N/A N=52 Low-Frequency, High-Intensity Ultrasound for Waist Circumference Reduction
Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat
Primary: Waist Circumference Change — -2.03 Inches
N/A N=62 UltraShape Power for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Excess Abdominal Fat
Primary: Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound — -10.5 percentage change
N/A N=70 Pivotal Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
Abdominal Fat
Primary: Difference in Circumferential Measurement Related to Sham and Therapeutic Group at 12 Weeks Post-treatment — 1.9; 0 cm
N/A N=60 Non-Invasive Reduction of Abdominal Fat
Fat Reduction
Primary: Proportion of Pre-treatment Images Correctly Identified — 128 photos — p=<0.001
N/A N=53 Study of Low Level Laser Therapy to Reduce Body Circumference in Obese Individuals
Obesity
Primary: Difference in the Proportion of Primary Outcome Successes Between Treatment Groups for Change in Combined Circumference Measurements — 20; 3 participants — p=<0.00005
N/A N=81 Efficacy and Safety of the BeShape One Device for Non-invasive Waist Circumference Reduction
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: Change in Waist Circumference — -1.87 cm — p=<0.0001
N/A N=62 Efficacy Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Light Therapy on Reducing Upper Arm Circumference
Body Contouring
Primary: Change in Combined Upper Arm Circumference Measurements From Baseline to Endpoint — 18; 1 participants
N/A N=60 LLLT for Reducing Waste Circumference and Weight
Weight Loss
Primary: Change in Weight — -0.5; -0.9; -0.6 Kg — p=0.723
N/A N=25 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Flanks of Patients With Sharp Body Curvature
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq System for Non-invasive Fat Reduction in Subjects With Greater Flank Curvature. — 0; 0 UADEs
N/A N=19 Fat Layer Reduction in the Lateral Thighs Using CoolSculpting
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the Outer Thighs — 8; 0 events
Phase 4 N=110 CoolSculpting® Elite for Non-Invasive Fat Reduction
Non-invasive Fat Reduction
Primary: Percentage of Participants With "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on Item #1 for the CSQ (Cryolipolysis Satisfaction Questionnaire) - Midsection — 83.3 percentage of…
N/A N=60 Non-invasive Cooling of Subcutaneous Fat
Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in Fat Layer Thickness of the Treated Flank — -18.7; -22.6; -17.8; -17.5 percent fat layer change
N/A N=175 Non-Invasive Cooling of Fat Cells
Reduction of Unwanted Fat
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Visible Improvement in Treated Area — 65.2; 82.8 percentage of participants
N/A N=40 Feasibility Study of a Belt Applicator
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound The Change in Fat Layer Thickness in the Treated Outer Thigh — -0.25 cm
N/A N=35 CoolSculpting System
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer Panel — 75.0 % of images identified correctly
N/A N=39 Clinical Evaluation of a 1060 nm Diode Laser, PEMF and Vacuum Assisted MP RF for Non-invasive Fat Reduction
Adipose Tissue Atrophy
Primary: Change in Aesthetic Appearance From Baseline — 0.97 score on a scale
N/A N=60 Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in the Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area — 4 incidence of device- and/or procedure AE
N/A N=20 CoolSculpting in the Abdomen Using Applicator With and Without CCI
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Accurately Identified Pre-treatment Photos — 33; 23; 50; 23 photos
N/A N=39 Comparing the Efficacy of a Dual-Frequency LLLT Device With a Sham Device as a Therapy for Adipose Tissue Loss
Obesity · Body Weight · Fat Burn
Primary: Change in Body Fat Percentage — -1.7556; 0.280 Percentage of Body Fat — p=<0.01
N/A N=60 Treatment of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Thighs Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Treatment of Adipose Tissue in the Thighs
Primary: Clinical Improvement in Thigh Circumference — -1.22; -0.59 centimeter
N/A N=31 An Evaluation of the Effect of the Erchonia Laser for Non-invasive Reduction of Submental Fat
Weight Loss
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Subject Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs by at Least Two of the Three Blinded Independent Evaluators. — 26 Participants
N/A N=14 Fat Reduction in the Submandibular/Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Pre-Treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 11 photos
N/A N=25 An Evaluation of the Effect of the Erchonia Corporation Violet Zerona® Z6 for Body Contouring
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Combined Circumference Reduction in Inches of the Waist, Hips, and Bilateral Thighs — -3.91 inches
N/A N=19 Bilateral; Flank Study With Crown Cooling Insert
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Correctly Identified Pre-treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 16; 15 photos