N/A N=60 Non-Invasive Reduction of Abdominal Fat
Fat Reduction
Primary: Proportion of Pre-treatment Images Correctly Identified — 128 photos — p=<0.001
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=45 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Inner Thighs
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Pre-Treatment Images Correctly Identified by Reviewers — 90.5 percentage of correct identifications
N/A N=19 Fat Layer Reduction in the Lateral Thighs Using CoolSculpting
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the Outer Thighs — 8; 0 events
N/A N=60 Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in the Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area — 4 incidence of device- and/or procedure AE
N/A N=14 Fat Reduction in the Submandibular/Submental Area
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Pre-Treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 11 photos
N/A N=25 Non-Invasive Reduction of Fat in the Flanks of Patients With Sharp Body Curvature
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of the Zeltiq System for Non-invasive Fat Reduction in Subjects With Greater Flank Curvature. — 0; 0 UADEs
N/A N=175 Non-Invasive Cooling of Fat Cells
Reduction of Unwanted Fat
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Visible Improvement in Treated Area — 65.2; 82.8 percentage of participants
N/A N=60 Non-invasive Cooling of Subcutaneous Fat
Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in Fat Layer Thickness of the Treated Flank — -18.7; -22.6; -17.8; -17.5 percent fat layer change
Phase 4 N=110 CoolSculpting® Elite for Non-Invasive Fat Reduction
Non-invasive Fat Reduction
Primary: Percentage of Participants With "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on Item #1 for the CSQ (Cryolipolysis Satisfaction Questionnaire) - Midsection — 83.3 percentage of…
N/A N=52 Low-Frequency, High-Intensity Ultrasound for Waist Circumference Reduction
Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat
Primary: Waist Circumference Change — -2.03 Inches
N/A N=35 CoolSculpting System
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer Panel — 75.0 % of images identified correctly
N/A N=62 UltraShape Power for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Excess Abdominal Fat
Primary: Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound — -10.5 percentage change
N/A N=31 An Evaluation of the Effect of the Erchonia Laser for Non-invasive Reduction of Submental Fat
Weight Loss
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Subject Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs by at Least Two of the Three Blinded Independent Evaluators. — 26 Participants
N/A N=60 LLLT for Reducing Waste Circumference and Weight
Weight Loss
Primary: Change in Weight — -0.5; -0.9; -0.6 Kg — p=0.723
N/A N=19 Tissue Optimization on Cryolipolysis Procedures for Fat Layer Reduction
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Before and After Side-by-side Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer (IPR) Panel…
N/A N=40 Feasibility Study of a Belt Applicator
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound The Change in Fat Layer Thickness in the Treated Outer Thigh — -0.25 cm
Early Phase 1 N=15 Safety and Efficacy of Deoxycholic Acid Injection for Reduction of Upper Inner Thigh Fat
Adiposity
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 08; 01; 02 participants
Phase 2 N=12 Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of RZL-012 in Subjects Seeking Fat Reduction in the Flanks
Flank Mass
Primary: Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events [AEs] — 12; 12; 9; 12 participants
Phase 2 N=43 Reduced Carbohydrate Versus Fat in Obese Subjects
Obesity
Primary: Change in Respiratory Quotient (RQ) — -0.0552; 0.00453 ratio
N/A N=45 CoolSculpting of the Flank With Alternate Treatment Parameters
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: The Number of Device and/or Procedure-Related Adverse Events — 12 device or procedure-related AEs
N/A N=70 SlimShape Device for Abdominal Fat and Circumference Reduction
Fat Disorder
Primary: Change in Fat Thickness at Final Follow-up Compared to Baseline — -1.76 millimeters
N/A N=39 Comparing the Efficacy of a Dual-Frequency LLLT Device With a Sham Device as a Therapy for Adipose Tissue Loss
Obesity · Body Weight · Fat Burn
Primary: Change in Body Fat Percentage — -1.7556; 0.280 Percentage of Body Fat — p=<0.01
Phase 4 N=16 Submental Study (Sequential Treatment Approach)
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: The Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least a 1-grade Improvement on the Clinician Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) at the Final Follow-up Visit When…
N/A N=20 CoolSculpting in the Abdomen Using Applicator With and Without CCI
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Percentage of Accurately Identified Pre-treatment Photos — 33; 23; 50; 23 photos
Phase 2 N=151 Efficacy and Safety of RZL-012 on Submental Fat Reduction
Submental Fat
Primary: Efficacy -Proportion of Subjects With at Least a 1-grade Improvement in the C-CAT Scale at Day 84 — 43; 39; 27 participants
N/A N=70 Pivotal Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
Abdominal Fat
Primary: Difference in Circumferential Measurement Related to Sham and Therapeutic Group at 12 Weeks Post-treatment — 1.9; 0 cm
N/A N=20 Evaluation of CoolSculpt Combining Venus Legacy Technology for Enhanced Results in Fat Reduction & Laxity of the Flanks
Adipose Tissue
Primary: General Improvement in Skin Laxity of the Flank Area — 1.1; 2.1 units on a scale — p=<0.01
N/A N=39 Clinical Evaluation of a 1060 nm Diode Laser, PEMF and Vacuum Assisted MP RF for Non-invasive Fat Reduction
Adipose Tissue Atrophy
Primary: Change in Aesthetic Appearance From Baseline — 0.97 score on a scale
N/A N=12 Performance Evaluation of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Lipolysis of Abdominal Fat
Body Fat
Primary: Number of Participants Who's Abdominal Tissue Showed Necrosis or Inflammatory Immune Cell Response — 10; 0 Participants
N/A N=15 CoolSculpting Treatment in the Upper Arms
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Correctly Identified Pre-treatment Photos — 26 photos