30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area — 4 incidence of device- and/or procedure AE
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: The Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least a 1-grade Improvement on the Clinician Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) at the Final Follow-up Visit When…
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Pre-Treatment Photos by a Panel of Blinded Independent Reviewers — 11 photos
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) — 160; 7; 11; 15 participants
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) 1-grade Response — 59.2; 65.3; 23.0 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) 1-grade Response — 58.3; 62.3; 34.5 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale Scores — -0.7; -0.8; -0.4 units on a scale — p=0.052
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SADEs) — 0; 0 participants
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Composite 1-grade Response — 66.5; 22.2 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Composite 1-grade Response — 70.0; 18.6 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 20; 19; 22; 21 participants
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 24; 13; 20; 14 participants
Moderate to Severe Convexity of Submental Fat · Safety · Efficacy
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Grade Reduction (Improvement) at 12 Weeks From Last Treatment Based on Both the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating…
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) — 0 Participants
Submental Fullness
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) — 13.2; 8.7; 20.0; 5.2 percentage of participants
Submental Fullness
Primary: Number of Participants With A Minimum of One Grade Improvement in the Standard Submental Fat (SMF) Assessment Grading — 15; 10 Participants
Weight Loss
Primary: Proportion of Accurately Identified Subject Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs by at Least Two of the Three Blinded Independent Evaluators. — 26 Participants
Skin Laxity
Primary: Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area — -0.18; -017 percent change
Body Fat Disorder
Primary: Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADE) — 0 Participants with UADE reported
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity Under the Chin · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Neck
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Submental (Under the Chin) and Neck Tissue Area at Day 90 Post-treatment — -14.4; -7.9; -22.3 square…
Submental Fat
Primary: Pharmacokinetics Measure - Drug Concentration in the Blood (ng/mL) — 487.7; 473.3 concentration (ng/ml)
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants With a Reduction of Submental Skin Area ≥ 20 mm^2 — 49 Participants
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
Moderate to Severe Convexity of Submental Fat · Safety · Efficacy
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Grade Reduction (Improvement) at 12 Weeks From Last Treatment Based on Both the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating…
Submental Fat · Healthy
Primary: Percentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 3 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both…
Submental Fat
Primary: Efficacy -Proportion of Subjects With at Least a 1-grade Improvement in the C-CAT Scale at Day 84 — 43; 39; 27 participants
Skin Laxity
Primary: Tissue Lift at the Submental Area Measuring >/= 20 mm2 — 56.9 percentage of participants — p=0.05
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade Improvement on the Submental Skin Laxity Scale — 2 Participants
Moderate or Severe Submental Fullness
Primary: Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Scores — 0.0; 0.0; 0.0; 0.0 units on a scale — p=0.6803
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved