Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Large fistula size and severe peri-fistula fibrosis significantly increase recurrence risk in vesicovaginal fistulasSpecific surgical factors predict recurrence of vesicovaginal fistulas

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that large fistula size and severe peri-fistula fibrosis are significant predictors of vesicovaginal fistula recurrence.

This systematic review synthesized 21 studies to identify predictors of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) recurrence. The analysis focused on both surgical and patient-related factors influencing outcomes in patients with VVF. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the included studies regarding design, etiology, and surgical techniques, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Several key findings emerged as significant predictors for recurrence. A fistula size greater than 2-3cm (OR: 1.0-6.0) and severe peri-fistula fibrosis (OR: 2.7 to 12.0) were associated with increased risk. Additionally, involvement of the urethra or bladder neck (OR: 0.4 to 9.0) and the presence of multiple fistulas (OR: 4.0 to 8.0) also predicted higher recurrence rates. Conversely, early intervention, surgery in a specialist center, and the use of interposition flaps were identified as protective factors.

The authors noted that results regarding surgical outcomes for secondary VVF repair are contradictory. While these findings may help improve preoperative risk stratification, clinicians should note that most included studies had a low to moderate risk of bias.

A vesicovaginal fistula is an abnormal opening between the bladder and the vagina. These can cause serious issues, but they are often treated with surgery. However, some cases do not heal correctly, leading to a recurrence of the opening. Understanding why this happens is vital for providing better care.

A review of 21 studies identified several key predictors that increase the risk of a fistula coming back. These include a large size (greater than 2-3cm), severe scarring in the tissue around the area, and involvement of the urethra or bladder neck. Having multiple fistulas at once also significantly increases the risk of recurrence.

On the other hand, certain factors can help protect against these issues. Early intervention, performing surgery in a specialist center, and using interposition flaps are all linked to better outcomes. While some results regarding previous failed repairs were mixed, these findings help doctors better prepare for and manage risks before a patient goes into surgery.

What this means for you:
Factors like large size, severe scarring, and multiple fistulas increase the risk of a vesicovaginal fistula returning.

Common questions

What makes a vesicovaginal fistula more likely to return after surgery?

Several physical factors increase the risk of recurrence. These include a large opening size over 2-3cm, severe scarring in the tissue (fibrosis), and involvement of the bladder neck or urethra. Having multiple fistulas at once also makes it more likely that the condition will return after an initial repair.

Are there ways to lower the risk of a fistula coming back?

Yes, certain factors are linked to better outcomes and lower risks. These include getting early intervention, having the procedure performed in a specialist center, and the use of interposition flaps during surgery. These steps help doctors manage the risk more effectively before the operation.

How reliable is the data on these surgical risks?

The review looked at 21 different studies to find these predictors. While most studies had a low to moderate risk of bias, the results for repairing previously failed surgeries were mixed. Talk to your doctor about how these specific factors might affect your personal treatment plan.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundRepair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is highly effective, with primary success rates of 80-95%; however, recurrence is reported in 10-30% of cases. Factors influencing recurrence include fistula size and tissue characteristics.MethodsThis systematic review identifies predictive factors for VVF recurrence by reviewing 21 studies published between 1994 and 2025 that met PRISMA criteria, and by analyzing the surgical outcomes from PubMed/MEDLINE data for various etiologies of VVF. Eligible studies reporting predictors of VVF repair were assessed for bias using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsThe following factors were consistently identified as predictors of VVF recurrence: fistula size greater than 2-3cm (odds ratio [OR]: 1.0-6.0), severe peri-fistula fibrosis (OR: 2.7 to 12.0), involvement of the urethra and/or bladder neck (OR: 0.4 to 9.0) and multiple fistulas (OR: 4.0 to 8.0). The following protective factors were identified: early intervention, surgery performed in a specialist center, and the use of interposition flaps. The Goh and Panzi classifications assist in the predictive risk stratification of patients. Most studies had a low to moderate risk of bias. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the studies, there was considerable variation in study design, etiology, and surgical technique; therefore, narrative synthesis rather than meta-analysis was performed. In most cases, secondary VVF repair has been documented to improve surgical outcomes; however, results for previously failed repairs remain contradictory.ConclusionUsing validated predictive factors for preoperative risk stratification may improve global VVF surgical outcomes. Closing the gap in surgical outcomes between regions and optimizing surgical techniques will require further prospective research and the development of predictive models.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.