Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Liquid biopsy shows high sequencing success in high-risk localized prostate cancer feasibility study

Liquid biopsy shows high sequencing success in high-risk localized prostate cancer feasibility study
Photo by Faustina Okeke / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider liquid biopsy feasibility data preliminary; concordance with tissue requires larger validation.

This phase 2 neoadjuvant trial evaluated the feasibility and performance of liquid-based genomic profiling (using cell-free DNA from plasma) compared to tissue-based genomic profiling (using FFPE tissue) in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. The study analyzed 22 FFPE tissue biopsies and 27 plasma samples, with sequencing success rates, coverage and depth, and detection of low-frequency mutations as secondary outcomes.

Only 12 of 22 FFPE tissue biopsies (54.5%) yielded usable data, while all 27 plasma samples (100%) were successfully sequenced. Liquid-based profiling detected an average of 3.5 genomic variants per sample, suggesting detection of biologically relevant alterations. Concordance analysis between the two methods was limited to just 4 matched samples, preventing meaningful comparison.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include low circulating tumor DNA levels typical in localized disease, low DNA quality or quantity in many FFPE tissue biopsies, and the very small number of matched samples available for concordance analysis. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported.

While liquid biopsy demonstrated robust technical performance in this small feasibility study, its practice relevance remains preliminary. The findings suggest plasma-based profiling could serve as a complementary approach when tissue samples are limited or of suboptimal quality. However, larger studies are required to establish concordance with tissue profiling and determine clinical utility in treatment decision-making for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Study Details

Study typePhase2
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundTumor genomic profiling using liquid biopsies offers a minimally invasive alternative to tissue biopsy-based approach, with advantages in accessibility, tumor heterogeneity representation, and repeatability. While established in metastatic prostate cancer, its feasibility in localized disease remains unclear due to low ctDNA levels.MethodsWe evaluated the feasibility and performance of tissue and liquid-based genomic profiling in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer enrolled in a phase 2 neoadjuvant trial. Genomic DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and cell-free DNA from plasma were analyzed using Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 panels and DRAGEN™ pipelines, with in-house filtering of artifacts and germline variants.ResultsOf 22 FFPE tissue biopsies, only 54.5% (12/22) yielded usable data, with failures due to low DNA quality or quantity. All 27 plasma samples (100%) were successfully sequenced, despite low ctDNA levels. Both approaches identified an average of 3.5 genomic variants per sample, including alterations in SPOP, ATRX, ATM, and ARID1B. Liquid-based genomic profiling achieved superior coverage and depth, enabling sensitive detection of low-frequency mutations. Concordance analysis was limited by the small number of matched samples (n = 4).ConclusionsLiquid-based genomic profiling is feasible and achieved high sequencing success rates in high-risk localized prostate cancer. Although concordance analysis was limited, plasma-based profiling showed robust sequencing performance and detected biologically relevant alterations. These findings support liquid biopsy as a complementary approach for molecular characterization, particularly when tissue samples are limited or of suboptimal quality. Larger studies are required to establish concordance and clinical utility.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.