Bibliometric analysis of 7,732 hypospadias articles reveals research trends and disruption metrics

Hypospadias, a common congenital anomaly requiring surgical correction, has seen growing research in surgical techniques and outcomes. However, no comprehensive bibliometric or disruption-based analysis exists to map the fields evolution. This study uses bibliometrics and the Disruption Index (DI) to identify key transformational research in hypospadias. A systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Dimensions) from January 1990 to December 2023 was conducted, yielding 7,732 articles. After applying inclusion criteria, 200 studies were analyzed. Citation data and DI scores were calculated using OpenCitations. Spearmans rank test assessed correlations between DI and citation metrics. A subgroup analysis identified trends based on the latest hypospadias research priorities. The mean citation count was 72.3 (SD = 43.1) with a mean DI of 0.011 (SD = 0.17). Five studies, focusing on complications, analgesia, and surgical techniques, had the highest DI (1.0). A moderate positive correlation was found between DI and citation rate ({rho} = 0.405, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed most research focused on surgical techniques (30.5%) and etiology (25.8%), while areas like surgical training (2.6%) and innovation (0%) were underrepresented. This study identifies critical gaps in hypospadias research. The DI reveals influential studies that redirect research trajectories. Future work should focus on innovation and translational research to accelerate advancements in hypospadias care.