Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review of CT-Guided Puncture Device in PCNL shows reduced time and radiation in small preliminary reportA new puncture tool helps doctors remove kidney stones faster and with less radiation

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider CT-Guided Puncture Device for novices in PCNL based on preliminary data showing reduced time and radiation.

This preliminary report presents a review and synthesis of data from 51 adult patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The study compares a CT-Guided Puncture Device against a free-hand CT-guided group and an X-ray-guided group. The primary focus is on puncture accuracy and stone-free rates, with secondary outcomes including puncture time, success rate, number of punctures, effective dose, number of CT scans, radiation exposure, and complications.

The authors found that the CT-Guided Puncture Device significantly reduced puncture time to 10.88 ± 2.07 minutes compared to the other two groups. Puncture success rate was 100% in the device group, which was significantly better than the comparators. The number of punctures was 1.82 ± 0.73, also significantly reduced compared to the other groups.

Regarding radiation metrics, the effective dose was reduced by 11.2% versus the free-hand CT-guided group with a p-value of 0.006. The number of CT scans was reduced by 23.6% versus the free-hand CT-guided group, also with a p-value of 0.006. Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported. Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported in this source.

The authors note limitations including the small sample size of 51 and the preliminary nature of the report. Generalizability should not be overstated. Long-term safety outcomes are not reported. The authors suggest the approach is especially beneficial for novices in PCNL, but practice relevance remains cautious given the study design.

Removing kidney stones often requires a procedure called percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This surgery involves making a small hole in the back to reach the stone. Doctors must aim carefully to hit the target without causing harm. A new device called a CT-Guided Puncture Device might make this task easier. It helps doctors see exactly where to aim using a computer scan. This report looks at how this tool compares to older methods that rely on free-hand aiming or X-rays alone.

The study involved 51 adult patients. Doctors used the new device for some and traditional methods for others. The results showed the new tool worked very well. It reduced the time needed to make the puncture. It also lowered the number of times doctors had to try to hit the target. Success rates were perfect in this group. Patients received less radiation exposure and fewer CT scans when the new device was used.

This approach seems especially helpful for doctors who are learning this skill. It gives them a steady hand to aim at the stone. The report notes that radiation levels dropped by 11.2 percent compared to free-hand methods. The number of CT scans used dropped by 23.6 percent. These changes mean less radiation for the patient and less time spent in the operating room.

However, this is a preliminary report with a small group of 51 people. That means the results are early and not yet fully proven for everyone. We do not know about long-term safety or outcomes for larger groups yet. This data is a promising start but needs more testing before it becomes standard practice everywhere.

What this means for you:
A new tool helps doctors remove kidney stones faster with less radiation in a small early study.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 51
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: A new type of CT-guided puncture device (CT-GPD) has been developed. We aimed to evaluate and compare the puncture accuracy and stone-free rates (SFRs) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) between the CT-GPD puncture group, the X-ray-guided group, and the free-hand CT-guided (FH-CTG) group. METHODS: From September 2023 to September 2024, 51 patients were divided into CT-GPD, FH-CTG, and X-ray-guided groups to perform PCNL. Basic patient data, procedure details, radiation exposure, puncture time, complications, and SFRs were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the patients' demographics, including age, sex, body mass index, and stone characteristics, among the three groups. The indices of puncture time, puncture success rate, and the number of punctures in the CT-GPD group were 10.88 ± 2.07 minutes, 100%, and 1.82 ± 0.73, respectively, which were significantly better ( < 0.05) than the other two groups. Compared with the FH-CTG group, the effective dose and the number of CT scans in the CT-GPD group were reduced by 11.2% ( = 0.006) and 23.6% ( = 0.006), respectively. CONCLUSION: CT-GPD is a valuable tool for establishing PCNL access. It may increase puncture accuracy, reduce radiation exposure, and avoid injury to the renal vascular and surrounding soft tissue without sacrificing the SFRs. This device may be especially beneficial for novices in PCNL.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.