This randomized controlled trial evaluated adjuvant intravesical BCG versus Epirubicin in a population of 122 patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Patients were followed every 3 to 6 months, with a mean follow-up of 19 months for the final analysis cohort. The study assessed tumor recurrence, progression, disease-free survival, treatment-related adverse events, and health-related quality of life.
Regarding primary outcomes, tumor recurrence rates were comparable between the groups, with 19.4% in the BCG group versus 28.5% in the Epirubicin group. Tumor progression rates were also similar, observed at 6.5% for BCG and 5% for Epirubicin. Mean time to recurrence was significantly prolonged in the BCG group (18 months) compared to the Epirubicin group (16.7 months), with a Log rank P value of 0.02. Similarly, recurrence-free survival was significantly prolonged in the BCG group (Log rank P = 0.02). Conversely, mean time to progression and progression-free survival were comparable between groups, with P values of 0.76 for both.
Safety and tolerability profiles differed notably between the interventions. Local treatment-related adverse events, including dysuria, urgency, and frequency, were significantly more frequent in the BCG group (19.5%) compared to the Epirubicin group (10%), with a P value of 0.03. Furthermore, the BCG group experienced significantly worse health-related quality of life, specifically in urinary symptoms and treatment-related future worries domains (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse events or discontinuations were reported in the provided data.
The study has no reported limitations regarding methodology or funding conflicts. Clinically, while both agents show equivalent efficacy regarding recurrence and progression rates, BCG offers a survival benefit in recurrence-free time at the cost of increased local toxicity and reduced quality of life.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant Intravesical BCG and chemotherapy are utilized viables options for intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC. We are lacking well-designed evidence for superiority of any in terms of effectiveness, toxicity, and patient tolerability.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the oncological outcomes, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in IR NMIBC patients who received intravesical BCG vs. intravesical Epirubicin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, 134 patients were randomly allocated into two groups; adjuvant intravesical BCG and intravesical Epirubicin. Patients were followed every 3 to 6 months by cystourethroscopy and urine cytology. The primary end points were recurrence, progression, and disease-free survivals. The secondary end points comprised treatment-related AEs and quality of life using HRQoL-EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of the 134 patients, 122 were followed for a mean of 19 months and included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline demographic/tumor criteria. The tumor recurrence and progression rates were comparable between BCG vs. Epirubicin groups, (19.4% vs. 28.5%), (6.5% vs. 5%), respectively. Mean time to recurrence and RFS were significantly prolonged in BCG group (18 vs. 16.7 months, Log rank P = 0.02) While time to progression and PFS were statically comparable between the two groups (18.5 vs. 18.3 months, Log rank P = 0.76). Local treatment-related AEs as dysuria/urgency/frequency were significantly more reported in BCG group (19.5% vs. 10%, P = 0.03). BCG group experienced significantly worse HRQoL in terms of urinary symptoms and treatment-related future worries domains (P = 0.008, 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IR NMIBC, adjuvant intravesical therapy with BCG and Epirubicin are equivalent in terms of recurrence and progression rates. Nevertheless, RFS was significantly prolonged in patient receiving intravesical BCG. On the contrary, patients treated with BCG experienced significantly more local bladder symptoms and worse HRQoL in terms of bothering urinary symptoms and negative treatment-related future worries.