Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds 47% PSA decline >50% with Ac-225/Lu-177 PSMA combination in mCRPC

Meta-analysis finds 47% PSA decline >50% with Ac-225/Lu-177 PSMA combination in mCRPC
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider Ac-225/Lu-177 PSMA combination activity in mCRPC, but recognize evidence is from retrospective data.

A systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from retrospective studies involving 323 patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination radioligand therapy using both [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA. No direct comparator was reported in the available evidence.

The primary outcome was PSA-based biochemical response. The pooled proportion of patients achieving a PSA decline greater than 50% was 47% (95% CI: 37% to 56%). Any measurable PSA decline occurred in 78% of patients (95% CI: 70% to 86%). The median overall survival estimate was 11.8 months (95% CI: 9.0 to 14.6 months).

Regarding safety, the most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse events were anemia (10%) and thrombocytopenia (6%). The review noted that severe toxicities were infrequent, and no cases of severe (grade ≥3) xerostomia were reported. Key limitations include the retrospective nature of all included studies and the overall limited data available. The authors report no funding or conflict disclosures.

This meta-analysis shows encouraging biochemical activity and a manageable safety profile for this combination approach in a heavily pre-treated population. However, the practice relevance is restrained by the low certainty of evidence from retrospective data. The findings represent an association and must be further evaluated in prospective clinical trials to determine long-term efficacy and survival outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 323
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up11.8 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has become a standard of care for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Lutetium-177 labeled PSMA radioligand therapy ([¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA) is an established and effective treatment option, while [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA shows promise in refractory cases. The tandem use of [225Ac] Ac and [177Lu] Lu-labeled PSMA ligands is currently being explored to harness the complementary advantages of both isotopes. This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of [²²⁵Ac]Ac -/[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) in patients with mCRPC. METHODS: This systematic review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus databases, covering all records from inception through March 2025. The primary endpoints focused on therapeutic efficacy, assessed through PSA-based biochemical responses. These included any PSA decline, a PSA decline of more than 50% from baseline, stable disease (defined as a PSA increase of < 25% PSA increase or a decrease of < 50%), and progressive disease (defined as an increase of ≥ 25% PSA) following tandem 225Ac-/177Lu-PSMA tandem RLT. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events. A random-effects model was used to generate pooled proportions through meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eight studies, including a total of 323 patients treated with [²²⁵Ac]-/[¹⁷⁷Lu]-PSMA combination therapy, were analyzed. The pooled response rates showed that 47% (95% CI: 37%-56%) experienced a PSA decline greater than 50%, while 78% (95% CI: 70%-86%) had any measurable PSA decline. The estimated median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI: 9.0-14.6 months). Severe toxicities were infrequent; the most common severe grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia (10%) and thrombocytopenia (6%). No cases of grade ≥ 3 xerostomia were reported. CONCLUSION: [²²⁵Ac]Ac-/[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT shows encouraging activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced mCRPC. Given the retrospective nature of the available evidence and limited data, these findings should be further evaluated in prospective trials to determine long-term efficacy and survival outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.