This meta-analysis of 12 studies evaluated erectile function in men undergoing prostate biopsy, comparing transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) approaches. The primary outcome was erectile function measured by IIEF scores at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure. The analysis included men undergoing prostate biopsy, though specific study settings were not reported.
At 1 month post-biopsy, there was a significant overall decline in erectile function (SMD: -0.3785, p = 0.038). The TP approach showed a slightly more significant decline than TR, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). At 3 months, no significant differences were observed between methods overall (SMD: -0.1663, p = 0.132), though TP biopsy alone showed a modest yet considerable decline (SMD: -0.1868, p = 0.03). By 6 months, erectile function generally returned to baseline with no significant differences between techniques (p = 0.41).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the meta-analysis. Limitations include potential heterogeneity across the 12 included studies and lack of reported absolute numbers for effect sizes. The findings provide evidence-based guidance for patient counseling, suggesting both biopsy techniques are associated with a transient decline in erectile function that typically resolves within 6 months, with no clear long-term advantage for either approach regarding erectile outcomes.
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a concern for men undergoing prostate biopsy. With the increasing adoption of transperineal (TP) biopsy over transrectal (TR) biopsy, it remains unclear which approach carries a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. This study aims to be the first meta-analysis to evaluate erectile dysfunction following TR versus TP prostate biopsy at 1, 3 and 6 months intervals, thereby providing clinicians with evidence-based guidance for patient counseling and shared decision-making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024541557) and followed PRISMA guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2024. A total of 22 studies reporting erectile function outcomes (IIEF scores) at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months post-biopsy were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. TR and TP biopsy methods were compared using a random-effects model to assess standardized mean differences (SMD) in erectile function at each follow-up point. The risk of bias for each study was evaluated to ensure result reliability.
RESULTS: At 1 month follow-up, a significant decline in erectile function was observed overall (SMD: - 0.3785, p = 0.038). The TP approach showed a slightly more significant decline than the TR approach; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). At 3 months follow-up, no significant differences were observed between methods overall (SMD: - 0.1663, p = 0.132), although TP biopsy alone showed a modest yet considerable decline (SMD: - 0.1868, p = 0.03). At 6 months, erectile function had generally returned to baseline, with no significant differences observed between biopsy techniques (p = 0.41).
CONCLUSION: Both TR and TP prostate biopsies are associated with a transient decline in erectile function. These effects typically resolve by 6 months in most patients, with no significant long-term impact observed. While the initial functional impact may be slightly greater with the TP technique, this difference attenuates over time. These findings are crucial for managing patient expectations post-biopsy.