Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mepolizumab fails to improve refractory chronic cough in small eosinophilic airways disease trial

Mepolizumab fails to improve refractory chronic cough in small eosinophilic airways disease trial
Photo by Cht Gsml / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that reducing eosinophils with mepolizumab may not improve cough in refractory chronic cough with eosinophilic airways disease.

A single-centre, randomised controlled trial investigated whether mepolizumab could reduce cough in 30 patients with refractory chronic cough and eosinophilic airways disease, defined as sputum eosinophils ≥2%. Participants received subcutaneous mepolizumab (100 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, with follow-up to 14 weeks. The primary outcome was change in 24-hour cough frequency.

At 14 weeks, mepolizumab showed no improvement in 24-hour cough frequency compared to placebo (percentage change relative to placebo +18.0%; 95% CI -46.4 to 160.1%; p=0.99). Secondary outcomes, including awake cough frequency, sleep cough frequency, cough severity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and quality of life on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, also showed no between-group differences. However, mepolizumab significantly reduced blood eosinophils (mean difference -237.7 cells·µL; 95% CI -328.3 to -147.1; p<0.0001) and sputum eosinophils over the study (p=0.045).

No major adverse events were reported, though detailed safety and tolerability data were not provided. Key limitations include the small sample size (n=30), single-centre design, and short 14-week follow-up. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. For practice, this trial indicates that in patients with refractory chronic cough and eosinophilic airways disease, mepolizumab's biological effect on reducing eosinophils did not translate to meaningful cough improvement, suggesting cough may be driven by alternative mechanisms.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 30
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting with chronic cough often have eosinophilic airways disease that remains refractory despite inhaled or oral corticosteroids. Studies in asthma patients have shown that eosinophils co-localise with airway sensory nerves, and after allergen challenge, are associated with neuronal sensitivity. We evaluated whether mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-5, reduces cough in patients with eosinophilic airways disease. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 30 patients with refractory chronic cough and eosinophilic airways disease (sputum eosinophils ≥2%). Patients underwent 1:1 randomisation to receive subcutaneous mepolizumab (100 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency at 14 weeks represented the primary end-point. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared to placebo, mepolizumab did not lead to improvements in 24-h cough frequency at 14 weeks (percentage change relative to placebo +18.0%, 95% CI -46.4-160.1%; p=0.99). We found no between-group differences in awake cough frequency, sleep cough frequency, cough severity on the 100-mm visual analogue scale, and quality of life on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Mepolizumab significantly reduced blood eosinophils compared to placebo at week 14 (mean difference -237.7 cells·µL, 95% CI -328.3--147.1 cells·µL; p<0.0001) and had a significant overall effect in reducing sputum eosinophils over the study (p=0.045). No major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory chronic cough and persistent eosinophilia despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy, mepolizumab did not improve cough despite reducing blood and sputum eosinophils. Targeting eosinophils might not impact cough in these patients, and their cough is probably driven by alternative mechanisms.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.