Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective cohort links IINS and RLR to survival in esophageal cancer surgery patients.

Retrospective cohort links IINS and RLR to survival in esophageal cancer surgery patients.
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note IINS and RLR as prognostic indicators for esophageal cancer survival, with caution regarding validation.

This retrospective cohort study included 660 esophageal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery. The investigation assessed the inflammation–immunity–nutrition score (IINS) and red cell distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio (RLR) as potential prognostic indicators for patient outcomes. The primary outcome measured was postoperative survival. No specific follow-up duration was reported in the available data provided for this analysis. The setting was not reported. The study phase was not reported.

IINS, RLR, and eight additional factors were identified as independent prognostic variables within the cohort. A nomogram incorporating these metrics showed superior discrimination versus AJCC staging. Statistical analysis indicated higher C-index and AUC in both cohorts. Additionally, DCA, IDI, and NRI confirmed greater net benefit and improved risk reclassification for the proposed model. These metrics were evaluated against standard staging methods to assess clinical utility.

Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability were not reported. The study authors note that External multicenter validation is warranted. Current evidence supports individualized risk stratification and perioperative optimization. These findings may inform patient selection for immunotherapy, though causality cannot be established from this retrospective cohort design. Clinicians should interpret these results with caution regarding generalizability and confirmatory studies. The study does not report funding or conflicts of interest. The publication type was not reported.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Systemic inflammation, immunity, and nutritional status are integral to tumor biology, shaping the microenvironment and influencing esophageal cancer (EC) outcomes. Yet, their integration into pragmatic prognostic tools—and potential implications for immunotherapy stratification—remain limited. This retrospective study assessed the prognostic value of the inflammation–immunity–nutrition score (IINS) and red cell distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio (RLR), indicators reflecting host immunity, systemic inflammation, and nutritional reserve, in EC patients. Clinical data from 660 EC patients who underwent radical surgery (2012–2018) were retrospectively analyzed and randomly assigned to training (n = 459) and validation (n = 201) cohorts. Candidate predictors were screened using LASSO and entered into multivariable Cox models. A nomogram incorporating IINS, RLR, and clinical covariates was constructed and validated with the C-index, calibration, and time-dependent AUC; clinical utility was evaluated with decision curve analysis (DCA), Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), and Net Reclassification Index (NRI). IINS, RLR, and eight additional factors were independent prognostic variables. The nomogram showed good calibration and superior discrimination versus AJCC staging, with a higher C-index and AUC in both cohorts. DCA, IDI, and NRI confirmed greater net benefit and improved risk reclassification. This study proposes and internally validates a nomogram linking immune–nutritional surrogates with survival in EC. By reflecting systemic inflammation and host immunity, the model supports individualized risk stratification, perioperative optimization, and may inform patient selection for immunotherapy. External multicenter validation is warranted.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.