This randomized controlled trial evaluated a nurse-led, structured rehabilitation consultation for adults with physician-diagnosed asthma in primary care in northern Portugal. 124 participants were randomized, with 98 completing follow-up (intervention n=48; control n=50). The intervention consisted of four individualised sessions (60 minutes in week 1, 45 minutes in weeks 2-4) delivered by a nurse, while the comparator was usual nursing care.
At 4 weeks, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in asthma control measured by the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT): mean change 5.9 ± 1.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.7 (Cohen's d = 0.6; p = 0.003). Quality of life (mini-AQLQ) also improved more in the intervention group: change 0.85 ± 0.23 vs 0.38 ± 0.13 (Cohen's d = 0.5; p = 0.006). Patient enablement (mPEI) improved by 8.0 ± 3.3 vs 6.0 ± 3.5 (Cohen's d = 0.6; p = 0.008).
No adverse events were reported. The analysis was per-protocol, including only those who completed assessments, which may introduce bias. The short 4-week follow-up limits conclusions about durability.
This model can be considered as an adjunct to routine asthma care in primary care settings, but longer-term studies are needed to confirm sustained benefits.
View Original Abstract ↓
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led, structured rehabilitation consultation for adults with asthma on asthma control, health-related quality of life, and patient enablement, compared with usual nursing care.
BACKGROUND: Despite effective pharmacotherapy, many adults experience poorly controlled asthma. Nurse-led rehabilitation approaches that combine education, inhaler technique training, and breathing and positioning strategies may strengthen self-management in primary care.
METHODS: Two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial conducted in primary care in northern Portugal (March-July 2023). Adults with physician-diagnosed asthma were randomised 1:1 to a four-week intervention (four individualised sessions; 60 min in week 1 and 45 min in weeks 2-4) or to usual care. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 4 weeks using the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT; primary outcome), the mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and the modified Patient Enablement Instrument (mPEI). Analyses followed a per-protocol approach, including participants who completed baseline and follow-up assessments. Between-group comparisons and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were used. Of the 124 randomised participants, 98 completed follow-up and were included in the final analysis (intervention n = 48; control n = 50). Compared with usual care, the intervention produced greater improvement in asthma control (CARAT change 5.9 ± 1.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.7; p = 0.003; d = 0.6), quality of life (mini-AQLQ change 0.85 ± 0.23 vs 0.38 ± 0.13; p = 0.006; d = 0.5), and enablement (mPEI change 8.0 ± 3.3 vs 6.0 ± 3.5; p = 0.008; d = 0.6). No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: A brief, structured nurse-led respiratory rehabilitation consultation improved asthma control, quality of life, and enablement over 4 weeks. This model can be considered as an adjunct to routine asthma care in primary care settings.