Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of Traditional Chinese Exercise for nonspecific low back pain in 3,054 patients

Meta-analysis of Traditional Chinese Exercise for nonspecific low back pain in 3,054 patients
Photo by Thao LEE / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider Traditional Chinese Exercise as a low-cost, safe complementary approach for nonspecific low back pain.

This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercise for patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). The pooled analysis encompassed 3,054 patients and evaluated secondary outcomes including pain intensity, dysfunction, quality of life, and overall treatment effectiveness rate. The authors synthesized data from studies characterized by substantial heterogeneity across intervention protocols, exercise types, treatment durations, and measurement instruments.

Key findings demonstrated that Traditional Chinese Exercise significantly reduced pain intensity, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of -1.21 (95% CI -1.66, -0.76). Dysfunction improved with a WMD of -6.80 (95% CI -10.18, -3.41), while quality of life was enhanced with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.64 (95% CI 0.33, 2.96). The overall treatment response rate increased by 17% (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.10, 1.24). Subgroup analysis of the Liu Zi Jue exercise showed the greatest analgesic effect (SMD = -1.71) and most significant improvement in functional disability (WMD = -13.35). Patients under 45 years exhibited a more favorable response (SMD = -1.52).

Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. The authors note that substantial heterogeneity observed across studies, along with diversity of intervention protocols and variations in exercise types, differences in treatment durations, and differences in measurement instruments used, limits the precision of pooled estimates. Safety data were not reported, and specific adverse event rates are unknown.

The authors conclude that Traditional Chinese exercise is an effective, low-cost, and safe intervention for NLBP patients and may be recommended as a complementary approach in clinical management. However, the lack of reported adverse events and the noted heterogeneity suggest that clinicians should interpret these findings with caution before integrating specific protocols into standard care without further validation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveA meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercise in reducing pain intensity, improving dysfunction and quality of life, and increasing the overall treatment effectiveness rate in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), so as to provide evidence for its clinical application.MethodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, this study systematically searched eight databases—CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Sinomed, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science—for randomized controlled trials published up to January 19, 2026. A total of 38 studies involving, 3,054 patients were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Based on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects or random-effects model was selected to synthesize the standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD), Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity.ResultsThe meta-analysis demonstrated that traditional Chinese exercise significantly reduced pain intensity [WMD = −1.21; 95% CI (−1.66, −0.76)], improved dysfunction [WMD = −6.80; 95% CI (−10.18, −3.41)], and enhanced quality of life [SMD = 1.64; 95% CI (0.33, 2.96)] in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). The overall treatment response rate was increased by 17% [RR = 1.17; 95% CI (1.10, 1.24)]. Subgroup analysis indicated that Liu Zi Jue (a specific Qigong breathing exercise) demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect (SMD = −1.71) and the most significant improvement in functional disability (WMD = −13.35). Additionally, patients younger than 45 years of age showed a more favorable response to treatment (SMD = −1.52). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, attributed primarily to the diversity of intervention protocols, including variations in exercise types, treatment durations, and differences in the measurement instruments used.ConclusionTraditional Chinese exercise is an effective, low-cost, and safe intervention for NLBP patients and may be recommended as a complementary approach in clinical management. Future research should include large-sample, standardized studies incorporating biomechanical and imaging techniques to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and develop evidence-based practice guidelines.Systematic Review Registrationidentifier: CRD42025649466 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.