Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

TEAS at PC6 during hepatectomy does not reduce PONV incidence within 24 hours

TEAS at PC6 during hepatectomy does not reduce PONV incidence within 24 hours
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that TEAS at PC6 did not reduce PONV after hepatectomy; analgesic-sparing effects are uncertain.

In a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted at three tertiary hospitals in China, 161 patients scheduled for elective hepatectomy were assigned to intraoperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at PC6 or no stimulation. All patients received standard antiemetic therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 24 hours postoperatively.

The primary outcome did not differ between groups: 23.8% in the TEAS group versus 26.6% in the control group (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42–1.76). For secondary outcomes, the TEAS group had fewer patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) attempts (2.7 vs 3.5) and fewer PCA deliveries (2.6 vs 3.5); p-values were not reported. There was no difference between groups in time to ambulation or time to gastrointestinal function recovery.

Safety and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the absence of reported p-values for secondary outcomes and the lack of reported adverse events. The practice relevance is that intraoperative TEAS did not significantly reduce PONV incidence in hepatectomy patients receiving antiemetic therapy; any potential to decrease analgesic requirements warrants further investigation.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedDec 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated whether adding transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) to a double-antiemetic regimen during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: In this multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted across three tertiary hospitals in China, patients scheduled for elective hepatectomy were randomized to either the TEAS group (stimulation at PC6 during surgery) or the control group (no stimulation). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively. Key secondary outcomes included the severity of PONV and pain after surgery. RESULTS: Among 161 randomized patients, 159 completed the study. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively between the TEAS and control groups (23.8% vs. 26.6%; OR, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.42-1.76). However, the TEAS group exhibited less patient controlled analgesia (PCA) attempts (2.7 vs 3.5) or deliveries (2.6 vs 3.5) by 24 h postoperatively. Recovery outcomes, including time to ambulation and to gastrointestinal function recovery, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative TEAS did not significantly reduce PONV incidence in hepatectomy patients receiving antiemetic therapy. Nonetheless, its potential to decrease the need for analgesics warrants further investigation to refine its role in perioperative care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05396716), https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.