Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Bibliometric review of anesthesia-associated postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients from 2000 to 2024

Bibliometric review of anesthesia-associated postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients…
Photo by Bermix Studio / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note significant heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and gaps between preclinical findings and clinical efficacy for anesthesia-associated postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

This publication is a bibliometric analysis rather than a primary clinical trial or systematic review. It synthesizes data from 923 publications retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed database, focusing on anesthesia-associated postoperative cognitive dysfunction specifically within elderly patient populations. The analysis spans the period from 2000 to 2024, offering a broad overview of the literature landscape rather than testing a specific intervention or comparator.

The authors identify critical limitations inherent in the existing body of work. These include substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria used across studies and the persistent difficulty in isolating the specific effects of anesthesia from those of surgical trauma. Furthermore, the review points out a notable gap between promising preclinical findings and their translation into proven clinical efficacy for this demographic.

Because this source is a review of literature rather than a randomized controlled trial, it does not provide pooled effect sizes or specific adverse event rates. The authors caution that the current evidence base is constrained by these methodological issues. Therefore, the practice relevance remains uncertain, and clinicians should interpret these findings with appropriate restraint regarding definitive conclusions on causality or treatment efficacy.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a common complication following anesthesia and surgery, particularly in elderly patients, yet its pathophysiology and optimal prevention strategies remain incompletely understood. This study employs bibliometric methods to analyze research trends in anesthesia-associated POCD from 2000 to 2024. A systematic review of 923 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, cross-validated with the PubMed database, was conducted. Bibliometric analyses were performed using the R package “bibliometrix,” VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to evaluate publication trends, key contributors, collaborative networks, co-citation patterns, and keyword evolution. Research output has grown steadily since 2000, with notable acceleration after 2018. The United States leads in productivity and influence, followed by China and Germany. Duke University is the most prolific institution. The British Journal of Anaesthesia and Anesthesiology are the core journals in this field. Keyword analysis reveals an evolution from early focus on surgical types and cognitive assessment toward neuroinflammation as the central pathological mechanism, with increasing attention to the delirium-POCD continuum, anesthetic optimization, and multimodal prevention. Emerging frontiers include the intersection of POCD with Alzheimer’s disease pathology, the role of the gut-brain axis, and the translation of mechanistic insights into targeted neuroprotective strategies. This bibliometric analysis delineates the evolution of POCD research from descriptive epidemiology to mechanistic and translational inquiry. Neuroinflammation has emerged as the unifying pathological hub. Key challenges include heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria, difficulty isolating anesthesia effects from surgical trauma, and the gap between preclinical findings and clinical efficacy. Future research priorities should focus on harmonizing diagnostic standards, validating biomarkers, and conducting large-scale multi-center trials to translate mechanistic discoveries into perioperative brain health strategies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.