Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds core muscle training reduces pain in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients

Meta-analysis finds core muscle training reduces pain in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider core muscle training for chronic nonspecific low back pain while noting high heterogeneity in the evidence.

This meta-analysis synthesizes data from 1,757 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. The review compares core muscle training modalities against non-core-training controls. Primary outcomes included pain and function. Secondary outcomes were not reported.

Core stability training significantly reduced pain with an SMD of -0.95. The 95% CI ranged from -1.35 to -0.55. Functional improvement showed an SMD of -1.09. Sling exercise therapy and Pilates demonstrated the strongest pain relief effects with SMDs of -1.43 and -1.48 respectively. Breathing training resulted in an SMD of -0.75. Conventional core stability training was less effective with an SMD of -0.36. The direction of effect favored the intervention group.

Safety data were not reported in the source material. Serious adverse events were not reported. Follow-up duration was not reported. The analysis noted high heterogeneity with I2 values between 93% to 95%. Practice relevance was not reported. Funding or conflicts were not reported. The authors acknowledge these limitations impact the certainty of the pooled estimates.

Combined interventions outperformed single training for functional improvement with an SMD of -1.07. Sling exercise therapy outperformed single training with an SMD of -2.60. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously due to the noted limitations. Further research is needed to clarify long-term outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of specific core muscle training modalities—core stability training, sling exercise therapy (SET), Pilates, and breathing training—vs. non-core-training controls on pain and function in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP).MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Thirty-three RCTs involving 1,757 patients were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis in RevMan, with subgroup analyses by training type, mode, and duration.ResultsCore stability training significantly reduced pain (SMD = −0.95, 95% CI: −1.35 to −0.55) and improved function (SMD = −1.09, 95% CI: −1.63 to −0.55), despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%–95%).For pain relief, SET (SMD = −1.43) and Pilates (SMD = −1.48) showed the strongest effects, followed by breathing training (SMD = −0.75); conventional core stability training was less effective (SMD = −0.36). For functional improvement, SET (SMD = −2.60) and combined interventions (SMD = −1.07) outperformed single training. Short-term (
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.