Combined EPA and DHA supplementation showed no broad benefit for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established disease
This meta-analysis examined the impact of combined eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on patients with established cardiovascular disease. The study focused on secondary prevention or perioperative settings where patients received high background guideline-directed medical therapy. The primary outcome assessed was major adverse cardiovascular events, while secondary outcomes included atrial fibrillation and postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence.
The analysis revealed no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events. While there was a trend toward reduced atrial fibrillation incidence, this did not reach statistical significance. The authors noted that the heterogeneous nature of the post-event populations likely contributed to the lack of broad benefit in reducing cardiovascular risk or atrial fibrillation risk.
Key limitations identified by the authors include moderate-dose combined supplementation use and limited subgroup reporting on metabolic comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia. The presence of concomitant therapies like statins and high background medical therapy reduced residual risk, potentially masking any potential treatment effects. Consequently, the practice relevance is limited to specific contexts rather than offering broad clinical utility.