Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Combined EPA and DHA supplementation showed no broad benefit for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established disease

Combined EPA and DHA supplementation showed no broad benefit for major adverse cardiovascular…
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that combined moderate-dose EPA + DHA offers no broad benefit for MACE or AF risk in heterogeneous post-event populations.

This meta-analysis examined the impact of combined eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on patients with established cardiovascular disease. The study focused on secondary prevention or perioperative settings where patients received high background guideline-directed medical therapy. The primary outcome assessed was major adverse cardiovascular events, while secondary outcomes included atrial fibrillation and postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence.

The analysis revealed no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events. While there was a trend toward reduced atrial fibrillation incidence, this did not reach statistical significance. The authors noted that the heterogeneous nature of the post-event populations likely contributed to the lack of broad benefit in reducing cardiovascular risk or atrial fibrillation risk.

Key limitations identified by the authors include moderate-dose combined supplementation use and limited subgroup reporting on metabolic comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia. The presence of concomitant therapies like statins and high background medical therapy reduced residual risk, potentially masking any potential treatment effects. Consequently, the practice relevance is limited to specific contexts rather than offering broad clinical utility.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 578
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain to impose a main global burden of morbidity and mortality despite advances in anticipation and treatment. Omega-3 fatty acids, mainly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have been extensively studied for potential cardioprotective effects, yet their impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains debated due to heterogeneity in formulation, dose, and patient subgroups. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and atrial fibrillation (AF), including postoperative AF (POAF), in patients with established CVD. A systematic search of Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2010-December 2021) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combined EPA + DHA supplementation in secondary prevention or perioperative settings. Data were synthesized using RevMan v5.3 with a random-effects model, and study quality was assessed via the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. From 3682 records, 25 RCTs (n = 25 578 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant reduction in MACE (effect estimate 0.042 ± 0.0499, Z = 0.850, 95% CI [-0.055, 0.140], p = 0.396; low heterogeneity) or AF/POAF incidence (trend toward reduction: -0.198 ± 0.1498, Z = -1.319, 95% CI [-0.491, 0.096], p = 0.187; modest heterogeneity). Neutral findings likely reflect moderate-dose combined EPA + DHA use, limited subgroup reporting on metabolic comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia) or concomitant therapies (e.g., statins), and high background guideline-directed medical therapy reducing residual risk. Although omega-3 fatty acids exert anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and lipid-modulating effects, this analysis indicates no broad benefit in reducing MACE or AF risk with combined moderate-dose EPA + DHA in heterogeneous post-event populations. Recent evidence highlights more MACE reductions with high-dose purified EPA monotherapy in high-metabolic-risk subgroups, balanced against dose-dependent AF increases at high doses (> 1.5 g/day). Future large-scale RCTs should prioritize biomarker-verified compliance, metabolic/concomitant therapy stratification, and formulation-specific comparisons to define targeted therapeutic roles. Trial Registration: This study has been registered in PROSPERO, and the registration code is 642795.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.