Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Additional ablation after PVI improves AF freedom in non-diabetics but not in diabeticsExtra ablation may not help diabetes patients with atrial fibrillation

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret the benefit of additional ablation after PVI in persistent AF cautiously in patients with diabetes, as this subgroup analysis was not powered for definitive conclusions.

This subanalysis of a multicenter RCT evaluated whether adding linear and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence differently in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). The study included 493 patients undergoing initial radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent AF. Patients were randomized to PVI alone or PVI plus additional ablation (PVI-plus group).

At 12-month follow-up, among patients without DM, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in the PVI-plus group (80.0%) compared with the PVI-alone group (71.1%, P=0.034). In contrast, among patients with DM, freedom from AF recurrence was similar between groups (75.4% vs 72.9%, P=0.696).

Safety outcomes were not reported. The main limitation is that this is a subgroup analysis of a trial not powered for subgroup comparisons, so the results are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive.

Clinically, these findings suggest that the benefit of additional ablation beyond PVI may be attenuated in patients with DM, but no firm conclusions can be drawn. The results do not support withholding additional ablation in diabetic patients based on this analysis alone.

How this fits prior evidence

This subanalysis extends prior coverage on AF ablation strategies. Earlier coverage noted that complete LVA ablation showed no arrhythmia-free survival benefit in persistent AF, while the present analysis suggests that additional ablation (linear/CFAE) may benefit non-diabetic patients. It also contrasts with the robust benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure, which have less certain effects on atrial arrhythmias. The finding that DM attenuates the benefit of additional ablation is novel and warrants further investigation.

A new analysis of a clinical trial suggests that adding extra ablation to standard pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may not reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients who also have diabetes. The study looked at 493 people undergoing their first catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. About half received PVI alone, and half received PVI plus additional ablation of other heart tissue.

After 12 months, the extra ablation helped people without diabetes: 80% were free from AF recurrence compared to 71% with PVI alone. But for people with diabetes, the rates were similar: 75% with extra ablation versus 73% with PVI alone. This difference was not statistically significant, meaning it could be due to chance.

Importantly, this was a subgroup analysis, meaning the study was not originally designed to compare these groups. The researchers caution that the findings are not definitive. No safety issues were reported in this analysis.

What does this mean for you? If you have diabetes and atrial fibrillation, this study suggests that the benefit of additional ablation may be less clear. Talk to your doctor about the best treatment approach for your specific situation.

What this means for you:
Extra ablation beyond PVI may not lower AF recurrence in people with diabetes.

Common questions

What is the main finding of this study?

In people with diabetes, adding extra ablation to standard PVI did not significantly reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence after 12 months. In people without diabetes, extra ablation did improve outcomes.

How many people were in the study?

The study included 493 patients undergoing initial radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Is this study definitive?

No. This was a subgroup analysis, meaning the trial was not designed to compare these groups. The results are not conclusive and need further study.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The EARNEST-PVI trial showed that left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) reduced atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent AF; however, the efficacy of left atrial additional ablation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of left atrial additional ablation after PVI in patients with and without DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study, a subanalysis of the EARNEST-PVI trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, analyzed 493 consecutive patients undergoing initial radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent AF. Patients were randomized to PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus linear and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (PVI-plus group). The primary outcome was defined as AF recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period after ablation. A total of 84 (17%) patients had DM. The primary outcome occurred in 120 (24%) patients. In patients without DM, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in the PVI-plus group than in the PVI-alone group (80.0% vs. 71.1%, P=0.034). In contrast, in patients with DM, freedom from AF recurrence was similar between the PVI-plus and PVI-alone groups (75.4% vs. 72.9%, P=0.696). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of left atrial additional ablation after PVI in reducing AF recurrence following catheter ablation for persistent AF was diminished in patients with DM.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.