Second arterial graft choice shows no survival difference but sex-specific complication patterns in CABGDoes the choice of a second artery in bypass surgery change survival or cause new risks for men and women?

Background Disparities between sexes in mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting remain incompletely understood. Multi-arterial grafting demonstrates superior outcome compared to single arterial grafting, although the optimal type of a second arterial graft and possible sex-dependent differences in grafting strategy have not been elucidated. We aim to determine whether the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery is the optimal second arterial graft. Methods We analyzed data from 14,196 patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with the left internal thoracic artery and either right internal thoracic artery or radial artery between 2013 and 2022 from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Patients were stratified by sex and type of second arterial graft. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included short-term complications and repeat revascularization. Results In both sexes, the choice of second arterial graft did not significantly impact long-term survival. Postoperative arrhythmias were more prevalent in both sexes following right internal thoracic artery use (p<0.001). The radial artery was associated with higher rate of repeat revascularization in men (p=0.044 at 5 years follow-up) and more cerebrovascular accidents in women (0.9% vs 0.2%, p=0.028). Conclusion The choice of second arterial graft did not affect long-term survival in either sex. The radial artery was associated with an increased risk of repeat revascularization in men and more cerebrovascular accidents in women. These results underscore the need for further research in the field of sex-specific considerations in operative strategy.