Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds beta-blockers may reduce cardiotoxicity risk during cancer therapy

Meta-analysis finds beta-blockers may reduce cardiotoxicity risk during cancer therapy
Photo by Joshua Chehov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider beta-blockers for potential cardioprotection in patients receiving anthracyclines/trastuzumab, noting agent-specific evidence varies.

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examined beta-blockers for preventing cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. The analysis included 19 RCTs for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) outcomes and 15 RCTs for cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity events (CTRCE). Patients received various beta-blockers including bisoprolol, carvedilol, nebivolol, and metoprolol compared to placebo or control groups.

Beta-blockers demonstrated superiority over controls for LVEF preservation with a weighted mean difference of 2.19 (95% CI 1.40–2.98), though substantial heterogeneity was present (I²=93.5%). For CTRCE, beta-blockers significantly reduced event risk with a relative risk of 0.54 (95% CI 0.44–0.67; I²=41.4%). Individual beta-blocker analyses showed bisoprolol (RR=0.28), nebivolol (RR=0.48), and carvedilol (RR=0.68) significantly reduced CTRCE, while metoprolol did not reach statistical significance (RR=0.33, 95% CI 0.07–1.56). In anthracycline-treated patients specifically, beta-blockers reduced CTRCE risk (RR=0.52, 95% CI 0.37–0.74).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the meta-analysis. Key limitations include high heterogeneity in LVEF outcomes, lack of absolute event numbers, and insufficient data on specific beta-blocker dosing regimens and treatment durations. The follow-up period was not reported. While these findings suggest beta-blockers may offer cardioprotection during cancer therapy, clinical application should consider the evidence strength for individual agents and the need for personalized risk assessment.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of beta-blockers (BBs) in preventing left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) induced by anthracyclines and trastuzumab. It combines traditional meta-analysis with Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the cardiac protective effects of different BBs.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Traditional meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA were used to evaluate the impact of BBs on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity events (CTRCE). The cumulative ranking probabilities (SUCRA) were used to rank the efficacy of different BBs. Data analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 and R 4.5.0 software.ResultsA total of 19 RCTs were included for LVEF outcomes and 15 for CTRCE outcomes. For LVEF, BBs were superior to controls overall (WMD = 2.19, 95% CI 1.40–2.98; I2 = 93.5%). Subgroup analysis indicated consistent and greater improvement with bisoprolol and carvedilol. NMA-SUCRA ranking: bisoprolol 0.7696, carvedilol 0.6822, nebivolol 0.6023, metoprolol 0.2413, placebo 0.2047. For CTRCEs, BBs significantly reduced event risk (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44–0.67; I2 = 41.4%). Subgroup analyses showed benefit with bisoprolol (RR = 0.28, 0.15–0.50), nebivolol (RR = 0.48, 0.27–0.86), and carvedilol (RR = 0.68, 0.53–0.87), while metoprolol did not reach significance (RR = 0.33, 0.07–1.56). Treatment-specific subgroups revealed significant benefit in anthracycline (RR = 0.52, 0.37–0.74) and combination regimens (RR = 0.58, 0.45–0.79), but not in trastuzumab monotherapy (RR = 0.16, 0.02–1.26). NMA-SUCRA ranking: bisoprolol 0.8085, metoprolol 0.7303, nebivolol 0.5124, carvedilol 0.3743, placebo 0.0745.ConclusionBBs demonstrated robust protective effects in maintaining LVEF and reducing CTRCE risk, with bisoprolol showing the greatest efficacy, followed by carvedilol. The evidence supports prioritizing BBs during chemotherapy with individualized selection based on treatment regimen and patient profile. However, large-scale, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm long-term benefits and to explore combination strategies with other cardioprotective agents.Systematic Review Registrationidentifier CRD420251233424.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.