Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

External validation of three DVT prediction models in 1,270 acute stroke patients.

External validation of three DVT prediction models in 1,270 acute stroke patients.
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider the Lu Qiufang model for DVT risk stratification in acute stroke, but await multicenter validation for broader use.

This single-center spatial validation cohort study evaluated the predictive performance of three DVT risk models in 1,270 patients with acute stroke admitted to the Stroke Center of South China Hospital of Shenzhen University. The study compared the Shen Xiaofang, Lu Qiufang, and Xi Pan models against observed outcomes without a traditional comparator group, as the primary aim was external validation.

The observed DVT incidence was 17.08% (217 of 1,270 patients). The Shen Xiaofang model yielded an AUC of 0.699, while the Lu Qiufang model achieved an AUC of 0.804. The Xi Pan model resulted in an AUC of 0.753. The Lu Qiufang model also demonstrated a positive predictive value of 48.4%, specificity of 84.9%, and accuracy of 82.1%. Brier scores were 0.182 for Shen Xiaofang, 0.154 for Lu Qiufang, and 0.245 for Xi Pan. Negative predictive values for all models exceeded 90%.

Decision curve analysis indicated greater net benefit for the Lu Qiufang model within a threshold probability range of approximately 0.20 to 0.70. Safety data, including adverse events or discontinuations, were not reported. The study authors note that the single-center design is a key limitation.

Further multicenter and cross-regional validation studies are warranted to confirm model transportability and generalizability across diverse healthcare settings. Clinicians should interpret these results with caution regarding the applicability of these specific models to their own patient populations before implementation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundTo evaluate the predictive performance of three previously established risk models for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with acute stroke and to support model selection in clinical practice.MethodsIn this single-center spatial validation cohort study, patients diagnosed with acute stroke and admitted to the Stroke Center of South China Hospital of Shenzhen University between January 2023 and January 2025 were consecutively enrolled. Three DVT prediction models, previously identified by a systematic review conducted by our research team, were selected for external validation. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, bootstrap calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA total of 1,270 patients with acute stroke were included, among whom 217 developed DVT, yielding an incidence of 17.08%. The AUCs were 0.699, 0.804, and 0.753 for the Shen Xiaofang, Lu Qiufang, and Xi Pan models, respectively. The Lu Qiufang model achieved the highest positive predictive value (48.4%), specificity (84.9%), accuracy (82.1%), and Youden index (0.536). All three models had negative predictive values exceeding 90%. The Brier scores were 0.182, 0.154, and 0.245. Calibration curves indicated that the Lu Qiufang model demonstrated the best goodness-of-fit, whereas the Shen Xiaofang and Xi Pan models exhibited systematic bias in certain risk intervals. DCA curves showed that the Lu Qiufang model provided greater net benefit within the threshold probability range of approximately 0.20–0.70, indicating superior clinical decision value.ConclusionAll three DVT risk prediction models demonstrated acceptable predictive performance in patients with acute stroke. Among them, the Lu Qiufang model showed comparatively superior discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit. However, given the single-center design of this study, further multicenter and cross-regional validation studies are warranted to confirm model transportability and generalizability across diverse healthcare settings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.