Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Right bundle branch block predicts recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation in retrospective cohort

Right bundle branch block predicts recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation in retrospective co…
Photo by Robina Weermeijer / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CRBBB as a potential predictor of recurrence after AF ablation, but interpret cautiously due to retrospective data.

This retrospective cohort analysis included 949 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent de novo radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The study categorized patients based on the presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB): non-RBBB, incomplete RBBB (IRBBB), or complete RBBB (CRBBB), with the non-RBBB group serving as the comparator. The primary outcome was recurrence after RFCA, with follow-up duration not reported.

Main results showed that the prevalence of CRBBB was 5.3% (n = 50) and IRBBB was 4.4% (n = 42). CRBBB was identified as an independent predictor of recurrence, while IRBBB was not associated with recurrence. Additionally, the prevalence of RBBB increased with aging, with a p-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance, though exact effect sizes and confidence intervals were not provided.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the retrospective design and the need for prospective multicenter investigation to confirm findings. The study used Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess predictive value, but causality cannot be inferred due to the observational nature. In practice, CRBBB may be considered a potential predictor of recurrence in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing RFCA, but clinicians should await further evidence before altering management based on this association.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The prevalence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and its prognostic value after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of complete RBBB (CRBBB) and incomplete RBBB (IRBBB) and to evaluate their impact on recurrence after RFCA in patients with AF. A total of 949 consecutive AF patients who underwent de novo RFCA between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into non-RBBB, IRBBB, and CRBBB groups. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the predictive value of RBBB for recurrence. The prevalence of CRBBB and IRBBB among AF patients was 5.3% (n = 50) and 4.4% (n = 42), respectively, and both increased with aging (p  The prevalence of RBBB is relatively high among AF patients undergoing RFCA and increases with aging. CRBBB may be an independent predictor of recurrence, whereas IRBBB is not associated with recurrence. The results should be proved by prospective multicenter investigation in the future.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.