Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CMR-guided management improves treatment satisfaction in patients with ANOCA.

CMR-guided management improves treatment satisfaction in patients with ANOCA.
Photo by Dmytro Vynohradov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CMR-guided management may improve treatment satisfaction and targeted prescribing in ANOCA, but safety and long-term outcomes are unknown.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 250 patients with suspected angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who had undergone invasive coronary angiography. Patients were assigned to either CMR-guided management (stress perfusion CMR with quantification of myocardial blood flow) or angiography-guided management.

The primary outcome was global treatment satisfaction, which was significantly higher in the intervention group (effect size 19.30 units; 95% CI 13.89 to 24.71; p<0.001). Secondary outcomes showed higher use of preventive therapies (85.5% vs 67.5%, 18.0 percentage points; p=0.001), calcium channel blockers (43.5% vs 27.0%, 16.5 percentage points; p=0.008), and long-acting nitrates (56.5% vs 32.5%, 24.0 percentage points; p<0.001) in the CMR-guided group.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study was conducted over 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Key limitations include the lack of reported safety data and the focus on patient-reported and prescribing outcomes rather than hard clinical endpoints.

These results suggest that CMR-guided management may improve treatment satisfaction and targeted prescribing in ANOCA. However, the absence of safety data and long-term clinical outcomes limits definitive practice recommendations.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 250
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) frequently receive empirical antianginal therapy that fails to target underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Whether stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-guided endotyping and stratified medical therapy improves treatment satisfaction and appropriate medication prescribing in this population is uncertain. METHODS: In the Coronary Microvascular Angina CMR Imaging Trial, 250 patients with suspected ANOCA, who had undergone invasive coronary angiography demonstrating no obstructive disease, were enrolled and underwent stress perfusion CMR with quantification of myocardial blood flow. Participants were randomised 1:1 to CMR-guided management (intervention) or angiography-guided management (control). Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the validated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Medication prescriptions were documented at these time points. RESULTS: Stress CMR imaging led to diagnostic reclassification in 53.0% of patients, with microvascular angina diagnosed in 51.0%. At 12 months, global treatment satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with controls (adjusted difference, 19.30 units (95% CI 13.89 to 24.71); p<0.001), with consistent improvements across the effectiveness and convenience domains. CMR-guided management was associated with more appropriate prescribing, including higher use of preventive therapies (85.5% vs 67.5%; p=0.001), and more targeted antianginal prescribing, including calcium channel blockers (43.5% vs 27.0%; p=0.008) and long-acting nitrates (56.5% vs 32.5%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ANOCA, non-invasive CMR-guided endotyping substantially improves treatment satisfaction and enables more appropriate, mechanism-targeted pharmacotherapy compared with angiography-guided care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04805814.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.