CMR-guided management improves treatment satisfaction in patients with ANOCA.
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 250 patients with suspected angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who had undergone invasive coronary angiography. Patients were assigned to either CMR-guided management (stress perfusion CMR with quantification of myocardial blood flow) or angiography-guided management.
The primary outcome was global treatment satisfaction, which was significantly higher in the intervention group (effect size 19.30 units; 95% CI 13.89 to 24.71; p<0.001). Secondary outcomes showed higher use of preventive therapies (85.5% vs 67.5%, 18.0 percentage points; p=0.001), calcium channel blockers (43.5% vs 27.0%, 16.5 percentage points; p=0.008), and long-acting nitrates (56.5% vs 32.5%, 24.0 percentage points; p<0.001) in the CMR-guided group.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study was conducted over 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Key limitations include the lack of reported safety data and the focus on patient-reported and prescribing outcomes rather than hard clinical endpoints.
These results suggest that CMR-guided management may improve treatment satisfaction and targeted prescribing in ANOCA. However, the absence of safety data and long-term clinical outcomes limits definitive practice recommendations.