Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion outcomes

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion out…
Photo by Mufid Majnun / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion, noting increased haemorrhage risk.

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 4 RCTs (n = 988) and 11 observational cohort studies (n = 7,521) regarding endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. The primary outcome was 90-day favourable functional status, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS 0–2), 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. The follow-up period was 90 days.

Results indicated a significantly higher likelihood of 90-day favourable functional status with endovascular therapy (OR = 1.92; 95%CI 1.51–2.43). Similarly, functional independence was significantly more likely (OR = 1.76; 95%CI 1.39–2.23). Conversely, 90-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower with endovascular therapy (OR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.49–0.68). However, the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was increased (OR = 2.57; 95%CI 1.31–5.06).

The authors conclude that endovascular therapy is confirmed as a cornerstone treatment for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. While the evidence supports improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality, the increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage must be considered. Limitations regarding specific study settings or funding conflicts were not reported in the source data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) is a devastating condition with high mortality and severe disability. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have significantly demonstrated that endovascular therapy is highly effective for VBAO, but its effectiveness for broader and real-world patient populations remains uncertain. This review aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for VBAO, integrating evidence from both RCTs and real-world data. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to July 2025 for RCTs and observational cohort studies comparing endovascular therapy with standard medical treatment in patients with VBAO. Our primary outcome was 90-day favourable functional status, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2). Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and 90-day mortality. A total of 15 studies were included in the analysis, consisting of 4 RCTs (n = 988) and 11 observational cohort studies (n = 7,521). Compared with SMT, EVT was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of a favorable functional outcome (mRS score 0–3: OR = 1.92; 95%CI 1.51–2.43) and functional independence (mRS score 0–2: OR = 1.76; 95%CI 1.39–2.23), and a significantly lower risk of 90-day all-cause mortality (OR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.49–0.68). However, endovascular therapy increased the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 2.57, 95%CI 1.31–5.06). Subgroup analyses showed that EVT was beneficial in patients with NIHSS ≥10, PC-ASPECTS 6 h (all p This integrated analysis confirms endovascular therapy as a cornerstone treatment for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion, demonstrating significant improvements in functional outcomes and mortality despite increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage risk. https://inplasy.com/projects/, identifier INPLASY202590088.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.