Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection in eight patients showed complete excision and no major complications.

Right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection in eight patients showed comp…
Photo by Aakash Dhage / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection as a potential minimally invasive alternative, noting limited current evidence.

This retrospective analysis evaluated eight patients who underwent right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection. The study assessed perioperative outcomes, near-term follow-up results, and specific metrics such as tumor excision completeness, postoperative complications, mortality, and embolic events. The mean follow-up duration was 21 ± 12 months.

Regarding surgical metrics, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 107 ± 64 min, and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 49 ± 39 min. Postoperative intensive care unit stay averaged 21.5 ± 4.1 h, while mechanical ventilation time averaged 16.4 ± 2.5 h. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 ± 1 days. No patient required postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

All eight patients successfully underwent thoracoscopic tumor resection, and complete tumor excision was confirmed in all cases (8/8). One patient concurrently received tricuspid valve repair involving papillary muscle reattachment (1/8). No significant valvular regurgitation was detected (0/8), and no residual tumors were found (0/8). Furthermore, no tumor recurrence (0/8) or distant metastasis (0/8) was observed during the follow-up period. No major postoperative complications, including mortality or embolic events, were observed (0/8).

The evidence supporting non-robotic fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection remains limited, largely owing to the deep anatomical location of ventricular lesions, restricted operative space, and the complexity of subvalvular structures. Consequently, these findings suggest that this technique may represent a promising standardized minimally invasive alternative to conventional open surgery, but further data are needed to establish broader practice relevance.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAlthough fully thoracoscopic resection of atrial tumors has become well established, evidence supporting non-robotic fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection remains limited, largely owing to the deep anatomical location of ventricular lesions, restricted operative space, and the complexity of subvalvular structures.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of eight patients who underwent right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic ventricular tumor resection between August 2022 and July 2025. Perioperative outcomes and near-term follow-up results were systematically evaluated.ResultsAll patients successfully underwent thoracoscopic tumor resection; one patient concurrently received tricuspid valve repair involving papillary muscle reattachment. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography confirmed complete tumor excision in all cases. No major postoperative complications, including mortality or embolic events, were observed. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was (107 ± 64) min, and the aortic cross-clamp time was (49 ± 39) min. The mean intensive care unit stay was (21.5 ± 4.1) h, mechanical ventilation time was (16.4 ± 2.5) h, and postoperative hospital stay was (5 ± 1) days. No patient required postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Echocardiography before discharge and during follow-up demonstrated no residual tumors or significant valvular regurgitation. The mean follow-up duration was (21 ± 12) months, during which no tumor recurrence or distant metastasis was detected.ConclusionA right-sided three-port fully thoracoscopic approach allows safe and controlled complete resection of ventricular tumors, with favourable perioperative recovery and near-to-mid-term outcomes. These findings suggest that this technique may represent a promising standardised minimally invasive alternative to conventional open surgery.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.