Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review suggests automated stool management system may reduce costs and nursing time in ICU fecal incontinence

Review suggests automated stool management system may reduce costs and nursing time in ICU fecal inc…
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider potential cost and time savings from automated stool management in ICU, but evidence is limited.

This is a narrative review examining the use of the Qoramatic Automated Stool Management (ASM) system compared to traditional absorbent pads and indwelling balloon catheters for managing fecal incontinence in United States intensive care units. The review synthesizes data from four patients' subgroups, with follow-up duration not reported, and does not specify if it is systematic or meta-analytic.

The authors report that the ASM system may reduce per-patient care costs by 80–94.5% (from $242–$1,344 vs. $1,215–$24,615 for traditional methods) and decrease nursing time by 91–96% (from 6–14 vs. 66–348 minutes per day). They also note that leakage and device-related injuries were nearly eliminated, and hospital stays were shortened by up to 30%. However, absolute numbers, p-values, and confidence intervals are not reported for these outcomes, limiting the ability to assess statistical significance or precision.

Key limitations include the small sample size of four patients' subgroups and lack of reported statistical measures, which reduces the robustness of the findings. The review does not address adverse events, funding, or conflicts of interest. In practice, while the authors describe the ASM system as a transformative solution warranting broader adoption, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously due to the observational and limited nature of the evidence.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Fecal incontinence (FI) poses a significant clinical and economic challenge in the U.S. intensive care units (ICUs), affecting 9–40% of patients and contributing to billions of dollars in healthcare costs mainly towards complications such as incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This review traces the evolution of FI management from rudimentary containment methods to the newest innovative Qoramatic Automated Stool Management (ASM) system with no balloon and zero radial pressure. We compared Qoramatic ASM to traditional absorbent pads and indwelling balloon catheters (IBCs) across four patients’ subgroups Results demonstrate that Qoramatic ASM reduces per-patient care costs by 80–94.5% ($242–$1,344 vs. $1,215–$24,615 for pads/IBCs), decreases nursing time 91–96% (6–14 vs. 66–348 min/day), and nearly eliminates leakage and device-related injuries. ASM also reduces HAPI and CDI incidence, shortening hospital stays by up to 30%. Qoramatic’s improved clinical outcomes, enhanced patient dignity, and reduced staff burden positioning it is a transformative solution for FI management in ICUs, warranting broader global adoption.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.