Pilot qualitative study explores pathways and acceptability of cash transfers for low-income patients with hypertension or diabetes
This was a pilot randomized controlled trial with a qualitative sub-study component. It enrolled 100 low-income Pennsylvania Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 or older with a diagnosis of pre-diabetes, diabetes, and/or hypertension who were prescribed at least one oral medication for these conditions. The study compared an unconditional cash transfer intervention to standard of care over a 12-week follow-up period, with 93 participants attending follow-up and 34 completing qualitative interviews.
The primary outcome was not reported. The qualitative sub-study explored secondary outcomes, including pathways through which cash transfers may influence health and the intervention's acceptability and feasibility. Participants reported that cash transfers were primarily used to address basic needs. They identified potential pathways for health improvement, including temporary reductions in stress and anxiety, changes in diet and physical activity, improved medication adherence, and increased healthcare seeking behavior. The intervention was viewed as highly acceptable by recipients.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the study's nature as a pilot and a qualitative sub-study, meaning it was not designed to measure quantitative health outcomes. The findings suggest unconditional cash transfers may improve health for patients with chronic diseases through a variety of pathways that should be measured in future trials. The practice relevance is restrained, as this research identifies potential mechanisms and demonstrates feasibility for future, larger-scale investigations.